1. Democracy, we will be able to vote out party if we think they are not performing or they are corrupt rather than the commission being picked cause David Cameron wants so and so there and all the other heads of states
2. TTIP - This is being negotiated behind closed doors theres no copies anywhere, no actual notes and from what i gather is something very american with things like privatization of state assets, GM foods, suing of the state for policies that affect corporation profits. MITO things that we will get this irrespective if we are out or in. I'd like to think the british public will immediately reject it and have a mutiny against the tories ala the benefits reversal on reducing it for disabled people.
3. Immigration, i'm happy with immigration but not uncontrolled immigration whereby any old person can enter. Somebody we need sure, humanitarian reasons why not. invite everyone who wants to come in no we cannot do that. In a utopia everyone would get on and everyone is welcome and everyone has all the food housing luxuries they need. Unfortunately this is a dream. We can't invite everyone in and we don't have the infrastructure for it. This is before Turkey enters which i'm pretty certain will happen down the line.
Cameron has promised to keep immigration down with over 330k net migrating in (which doesn't account for the NI applications deficit which gives a better indicator) but guess what, he can fall back on the freedom of movement and it's a very good excuse. He won't have that anymore
More people means more pressure on housing, it's not a coincidence that ****holes in london that you could have got for a pittance are now costing a stupid amount of money. It's because theres been a lot of migration there. I'm not even going to go into class sizes, people using the NHS, benefits and stuff (in all honesty i'm not that knowledgeable on it all, to me this all makes logical sense).
4. EU corruption/beauracracy. We waste enough money on middle managements in civil services and MPs. Do we need to spend a whole load more on MEPs who have meetings in belgium but then have more meeting in strasbourg and get paid to travel to and from their respective countries. I heard people mention this but auditors aren't prepared to sign off on 100 billion pounds worth of EU spending. Sounds fishy to me
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...more-than-100billion-of-its-own-spending.html
5. Giving money to causes like the EU. We give 150m to the EU every WEEK. they spend it on things like making other up and coming countries more prosperous (not a bad thing) or wasting it on beauracracy see above.
6. Trade deals with other countries. These deals are meant to help us grow. Do i think being part of the EU will get us a better deal. Possibly. Do i think they will get one? well not until all 28 countries will agree upon it. It's easier to agree with 1 of us that 28 of us who all want something different.
The main reason for wanting to stay in for most people is for economic reasons. Maybe it's because i won't be in financial trouble so i can honestly appreciate why people will vote in if they are worried for their jobs but for the reasons above i'm a brexiter even if having more rules and regulations helps me as i work in IT and all these rules have to be implemented into systems
The problem with this referendum is that both camps can come up with rational reasons and arguments. No one is willing to admit to any weaknesses or negatives so that the public is getting confused and/or going with their prejudices or gut instinct without being provided with the facts.
If for example, the Brexit camp could admit to some economic uncertainty, and even a minor (temporary?) recession as our market is reduced. But it is a price worth paying for more control of European immigration and more sovereignty (see below).
The Remain camp should acknowledge that we are having to accept some European rules from bureaucrats and our immigration control is being hampered but these are prices worth paying for getting access to a bigger market on favourable terms as a member and being a member of a big club with free movement and lots of cooperation etc.
On the loss of sovereignty, below is an interesting article in the Times by Malcolm Rifkind (a eurosceptic and ex Thatcherite Tory minister)
-----------------
Are we giving away too much sovereignty to Brussels? No
malcolm rifkind
How many people are aware that Britain’s net contribution to the EU is a tiny 1.2 per cent of UK public expenditure.
It is clear that if the European referendum is decided on jobs or on our standard of living Brexit will lose heavily. But there is one slogan that resonates with many. “Give us control of our country; give us back our sovereignty.”
I have thought hard on that demand. If it is valid, there would be a case that the price of membership of the EU is too high, whatever the benefits. To come to a conclusion as to whether we are no longer an independent state should not be by indulging in rhetoric, but by looking at facts.
The most important issue is
declaring war. Who decides? It is obvious from the Falklands and Iraq that these decisions, for good or ill, were taken, as they still would be, by our own government.
Sovereignty must also mean the sole
right to tax. That was why our Civil War was fought in the 1640s. It is Westminster, not Brussels, that decides the taxes that we pay.
Furthermore, it is the Bank of England, not Frankfurt, that decides interest rates and mortgage rates that determine our bills.
The largest area of spending is
social security, including pensions and welfare benefits. These are determined by our parliament not by Europe. Likewise, it is we who decide spending on the
NHS, schools and colleges, housing, police forces prisons and roads and transport. How many people are aware, in fact, that Britain’s net contribution to the EU is a tiny 1.2 per cent of UK public expenditure?
We share sovereignty in some areas but it suits us overwhelmingly
Of course, the EU does have
supranational powers in certain areas with majority voting. The European Court of Justice does have the last word but that is limited to disputes as to the meaning of the EU treaties or regulations. A very high proportion of these supranational decisions, where the UK does not have a veto, are limited to
agriculture and the
single market. The National Farmers’ Union has announced that a large majority of farmers want Britain to remain in the EU. as regards the single market, its creation has been, perhaps, Britain’s greatest achievement since we joined the EU.
I was Margaret Thatcher’s Europe minister in the 1980s. Mrs Thatcher wanted a single market and she accepted decisions would need to be taken by a majority to ensure that countries hostile to free trade could not obstruct it.
The single market has always required
free movement for all EU citizens including our own. If many choose to come to the UK that is because we are one of Europe’s most successful economies. As we have one of the lowest levels of unemployment in the EU it can hardly be argued that we have suffered greatly from their presence.
The most ridiculous part of the Brexit case is that Britain should not just leave the EU but also abandon the single market. There was not a hint, until recently, that this was what Brexit would demand. For years they argued that we could still have access to the single market, like Norway or Switzerland. Now that has been cast aside because they have discovered that Norway and Switzerland accept free movement of labour as a price of access.
Brexit now gives us their vision of “a Europe with free trade from Iceland to Russia”. When challenged as to which European countries to copy that are not either in the EU or accept its rules, they have offered Albania as a model for the UK. If Brexit supporters think that Albania is the right model for Britain they must have been disappointed when the Albanian prime minister declared that his country wanted to join the EU.
If staying in the EU meant we had to join the euro I would be voting to leave. A
single currency is, for me, a major derogation of sovereignty.
The prime minister’s achievement has been to ensure that “ever closer union” does not require the UK to accept any further integration that is not in our interests.
We do share sovereignty in some areas but it suits us overwhelmingly to do so. The single market, including the free movement of labour, is one of the reasons for our status as the world’s fifth largest economy.
It is not surprising that young Britons overwhelmingly wish us to remain in the EU. We will be damaging their future if we vote to leave.
--------------------------
You must log in or register to see images