You don’t have a plan though.
Just saying ‘Falklands’ isn’t a plan, it’s total guesswork.
Off Topic WW3 How Close?
- Thread starter Nozs’ Hat
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
You don’t have a plan though.
Just saying ‘Falklands’ isn’t a plan, it’s total guesswork.
Employing experts to carry out a task that has been done by other people is a plan though
Just like saying I want an extension built on my house the same as others have had done, I could not build it myself so would employ experts
In reality only a tiny percentage of migrants come on boats and spend on them is a piss in the ocean. Facts not opinions. Its a matter for security of course. We need to protect people- the host community AND vulnerable travellers/children. Most spend is on the ill and elderly and i’m happy to pay to help humans personally, if others pay the same %.
The irony is that Reform represent the wealthy tax dodging class and wont care if working class people die as a result.
As the racist millionaire/ billionaire army drive up oil prices to avoid justice, the Reform rich boys suffer the least.
Last edited:
According to reform only white people can be english / European.
Yes that’s all fine.
So your entire plan, to stop the boats, is simply to ask some experts to arrange it all …
… you’d think all the previous administrations would’ve asked them by now.
Last edited:
Never seen that, as not in reform, am sure seen some of the leaders of reform and they are not white, but i bow to your expertise.
So send them all to the Falklands to create the own camps and committees.
Then as they have families, they will all be born as full British citizens and able to all move and live in England
Last edited:
Why would the Falklanders accept the building of illegal immigration camps on their tiny island? I'm sure they would have a say, and it would rhyme with 'cluck off!'
Unless we ship all the illegal immigrants to the Falklands, then give it to the Argies. Result!
Arrivals by small boat, 1 January 2026 to 9 March 2026
3,409 peopleThat’s roughly the entire population of the Falklands.
So sending them 8,000 miles would cost a fortune and involve the RAF. Materials would have to be flown in, roads laid, water, sewage and electricity plants built. An advance workforce would have to be sent out to build all of this infrastructure and another to build the camp.
Before any of that could happen it would need a workforce of around 1,000 people so their accommodation would have to be built before the work could start on the camps.
As we’re already short of workmen where would you find an extra thousand to build houses for them, the infrastructure and then the camp. How much would you have to pay someone to spend at least a year on a windswept island with virtually no facilities?
They’d all have to be single men with no families, need for entertainment or any kind of sexual needs. The islanders themselves would be asked to accept 1000 bored workmen plus 3/4000 caged migrants in a prison, I’m sure they’d be thrilled.
Security staff, cooks, doctors, nurses, etc would have to be recruited and provided with accommodation etc. Medicines, food and other provisions would have to be flown in but that presents another problem. The nearest habitation is Argentina who wouldn’t help in any way and, in any case, are at least 300 miles away.
So, apart from the Falkland Islanders protesting, the unavailability of a workforce and it being 8,000 miles away it’s a cracking idea and just like Australia.
You must log in or register to see images
Arrived by small boats in the last 10 years, just short of 200,000, it’s not all bad though by Smugs reckoning we have an extra 50,000 builders in employment, that must be why Labour can’t get their houses built.
And you don't have to be an "expert" to see all this. So actual "experts" in this kind of thing would just laugh in the face of anyone who was seriously suggesting anything similar.
None of these arguments bear scrutiny unfortunately, if it were that simple no European country would have a problem.
Using the Falklands is a complete non-starter as are the other ridiculous ideas …
… it simply couldn’t be done.
And you don't have to be an "expert" to see all this. So actual "experts" in this kind of thing would just laugh in the face of anyone who was seriously suggesting anything similar.
The ‘experts’ probably go along with Farage’s scheme to get the Royal Navy to escort migrants back to France or Belgium.
Well they are all doctor according to their supporters so non of them needed, does not need much to erect few huts and a few generators for power and water. Which experts have said a country could not build a camp in a remote area cos I've seen none.
If not Falklands then south Georgia, only penguins on there and we will have no complaints from the Greens as they don't seem to care about displacement of wildlife in UK.
You can’t be listening to the experts on here mate, they are all builders you know
Why when there is plenty of people about with expertise in that field, plenty of ex military that would willingly do it.