Winter transfer window
- Thread starter Washysafc
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Hardly an endorsement of the player ... 'We're looking at loans but we'll keep him if no one takes him'.
I'd suggest he'd have no choice if no one signs him.
Ruud might be gone by the end of the window tbh!
So, if hes going out on loan again, why not keep him at Stoke?
just seems odd...
unless, he really is playing it down and isnt aware of bids or the progession of any sort of deal being done?
just seems odd...
unless, he really is playing it down and isnt aware of bids or the progession of any sort of deal being done?
Interesting that Ruud said they're loan deals.
It sounds ridiculous but Ruud might be completely disassociated with it as he's not treating him as his player, so he himself might not even know.
If Nixon is close to the agent he potentially might know what Ruud doesn't.
Which sounds absolutely stupid and bonkers but I don't think its far fetched.
You must log in or register to see media
Atlanta Utd spending £30m
Don't understand Latte Lath going there at all. He's 26 and is more than good enough for a PL move, doubt he ever gets that now. Good business by Boro if they can get a couple of defensive players with that moneyYou must log in or register to see media
Atlanta Utd spending £30m
wouldn't be shocked to see them go all in for Cannon, Gibson doesn't mess about usually
prefer cappuccino over lattes
and you just know who is scoring against us if cannon does go to the smallest club in yorkshire on the 3rd of feb
and you just know who is scoring against us if cannon does go to the smallest club in yorkshire on the 3rd of feb
You must log in or register to see media
Westerlo signing their second striker in a week... on a 6 month deal
Frigan on the move?
Frigan pack it in, the pair of you
Is it just me that thinks we wouldn't have let Connolly go without having a striker close in signing
I would usually agree but I think we would do that on a human level to let him go and play anyway, clear RLB didn't fancy him
Think he is probably meaning that they are loan deals initially, with the buy part of it linked to either side gaining promotion.
Yeah, we aren't the type of club to keep a player if they are wanting to move to get minutes etc.. especially with the way he signed. Not like we paid a fee for him.