Come on then, someone enlighten me what flag is that?
You must log in or register to see media
Come on then, someone enlighten me what flag is that?
Ba is both footed. The diagonal ball to Clarke leading up to Ba's goal was off his left pegI was thinking that. Ba could probably play out on the left as he's right footed I think.
Ba or Mundle one wing ; Roberts or Amad on the other.
That's if we lose Clarke obviously.
“Most of his career”? He’s been here most of his career. Playing in defenceNo he doesn’t. He didn’t even start playing until he was 19 and that in was in league one. He’s got about 60 championship games under his belt that’s not loads of experience.
O’nien is the only player we have regularly starting who’s over the age of 23 and most of his career has been spent as a midfielder in the lower leagues playing against ****e.
6"2 I think. Looks quick as well.My apologies if that has already been mentioned but is the new lad Hjelde a bit of a unit? Just interested what height, weight etc we are adding to the back line.
My apologies if that has already been mentioned but is the new lad Hjelde a bit of a unit? Just interested what height, weight etc we are adding to the back line.

Considering he looks like Ivan Drago offaf rocky i think he’ll be canny !My apologies if that has already been mentioned but is the new lad Hjelde a bit of a unit? Just interested what height, weight etc we are adding to the back line.
Remember that. Bridges at near post let the ball go past him.he scored for Forest at SOL in 1997
You must log in or register to see media
Remember that. Bridges at near post let the ball go past him.


If we're sticking with 4-3-3, I honestly don't know where Amad even fits, unless we went with a false 9 and he played in that role.
I can't see us bringing him in to replace one of either Ba, or Roberts.
So that leaves us with going back to 4-2-3-1, and playing Neil and Ekwah as the 2, and then dropping Jobe, which I don't think they'd do.
“Most of his career”? He’s been here most of his career. Playing in defence
If we're sticking with 4-3-3, I honestly don't know where Amad even fits, unless we went with a false 9 and he played in that role.
I can't see us bringing him in to replace one of either Ba, or Roberts.
So that leaves us with going back to 4-2-3-1, and playing Neil and Ekwah as the 2, and then dropping Jobe, which I don't think they'd do.
All these numbers and formations are screwing with my head, I wish it was Friday.Understand the point. But I do think its to be the right of a 4-3-3. There's always the flexibility within games to move to 4-2-3-1
Amad will play in the 10 with Clarke and Ba wide and proper 9 on the pitch if Beale has any common sense.
Amad will play in the 10 with Clarke and Ba wide and proper 9 on the pitch if Beale has any common sense.

This is the first time you’ve logged on for about 4 weeks now mate, are you ok.Thanks a lot for that mate
I was at that game, sober, and couldn't remember any details ...
... I've been trying to convince mesel that my memory isn't fading but you've just confirmed my fears.
Good news for those who don't like me, can't be long until I wake up and forget to log on![]()
That then forces Neil and Ekwah to sit deeper though, which Ekwah in particular is ****e at.