I would expect it to be a loan with a view to it being made permanent in the summer.
Perhaps, but if so I feel like it's a waste of a loan spot when it's already tight, unless this is going to trigger Bedia going back.
I would expect it to be a loan with a view to it being made permanent in the summer.
The reality is he scored 28 goals in a calendar year for Servette. How Union Berlin then used him is up to them, not just on the player.the reality soon stuck though didnt it
hence why hes on loan after 6 months
Perhaps, but if so I feel like it's a waste of a loan spot when it's already tight, unless this is going to trigger Bedia going back.
The reality is he scored 28 goals in a calendar year for Servette. How Union Berlin then used him is up to them, not just on the player.
Hes a bit ****
As we know
We want rid too
Don't disagree. Just answering your questions.Hes a bit ****
As we know
We want rid too
Are we even able to cancel his loan?
Guessing it depends on the terms of the deal
Might cost us?
Times Omur has scored = 0 (except a friendly). He is ‘promising’ in the way broken promises are.Times Omur has looked bad in the middle: 1
Times Omur has looked bad on the wing: Lots
Times Omur has looked good in the middle: Lots
Times Omur has looked good on the wing: 0
Crooks on the end of Giles crosses’ someone bell Watmore lets get the band back together
We've been linked to Gelhardt before haven't we?
Its a good solution. If finances make Giles returning to Boro difficult, we bring Boro to him. Problem solved.
Translation.