But we can't afford top quality prem proven players, if we somehow magic up the money to afford the fee, someone matches the fee and then doubles the wage.
I ask you out of our successful signing how many where "top quality" when we signed them.
Out of where?
What defines success?
What defined top quality?
case in point:
alisson.
bought form italy not england.
I think success is a given
Clearly top quality when arriving
VVd
Bought in the prem so "proven"
I think success is a given
Would you call him top quality when arriving? some (not me) would say he was not as there were doubts
Mane
See above. Man utd rejected him the summer before
etc etc etc
LFC have rarely bought marque names.
Quality is about knowing and judging what that player can bring not what their record says. the person who can see quality is going to be the most successful rather than the person who can buy proven success.
As we stand there's not that much awful about our sqaud in theory but in practice they've failed the first test as the slightest big of pressure and they fell back into their shell. In practice we don't look fit or well drilled and thats IMO far more worrying than which two players might we add to the team.
As it stands we are not going to be in the top 4 come may, not because of signings but because of fitness and tactical ability and bottle. I'm SURE the talent is in there. absolutely sure of it. but its not going to show up without being fit and aggressive.


