Transfer Embargo

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What’s gonna happen

  • Temporary blip

  • Complete ****ing collapse

  • It’ll all be ok

  • Relegation


Results are only viewable after voting.
It’s a really concerning article as it isn’t just a summary of what we already know. It reveals even more concerning details about the club’s finances, namely that we owe almost £22M in transfer fee instalments to other clubs and that we even made requests to clubs to delay the payments further.

Buckingham even said The Athletic have seen the evidence of this which means club employees are leaking copies of the club’s financial arrangements to the press. That alone suggests how concerned club staff are about the way the club is being run.
In the accounts there is a figure of £22m but they are described as "loans".
 
Yep wasnt wages 135% of income? something like that

Which is actually not too bad if the owner is a billionaire and the club’s liquidity is in a good place. However, if the club’s coffers are dry and the owner has to move money around from various accounts to pay the club’s bills then it’s disastrous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evington
In the accounts there is a figure of £22m but they are described as "loans".

Is that from the 23/24 accounts?

Buckingham’s article suggests the £21.8M figure relating to future transfer fee instalments is from a leaked club financial document from May 2025 which isn’t public knowledge yet for obvious reasons.
 
Is that from the 23/24 accounts?

Buckingham’s article suggests the £21.8M figure relating to future transfer fee instalments is from a leaked club financial document from May 2025 which isn’t public knowledge yet for obvious reasons.
yes
there was nothing like that figure in the 2023-2024 accounts - trade creditors (where transfer fees owed would reside) were £9m.
 
it wouldnt surprise me if we still owe 2m for giles transfer and omur too

its an absolute ****show, and i think it only gets worse
 
yes
there was nothing like that figure in the 2023-2024 accounts - trade creditors (where transfer fees owed would reside) were £9m.

They might not be the same figure then, Pete. Buckingham says in his article he’s seen a leaked document of the club’s finances from May 2025 which show us owing £21.8M in future transfer fee instalments. This is probably a different figure to the £22M in the 23/24 accounts. We’ll find out when the accounts are published for 24/25.

It’s possible the £9M figure in the 23/24 accounts has been increased to £21.8M due to the 24/25 transfer business (instalments for Mehlem, Racioppi, Millar, Burstow, Hughes, Palmer, Belloumi, Kamara, Crooks, Joseph and Matazo).
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
The writing was on the wall when our wage bill topped our income. He was fully complicit in paying mediocre players top Championship wages...A disaster waiting to happen.

Much of the Championship has a wage bill higher than its revenue, we're certainly not alone on that front.

I saw an amazing stat the other day, the total revue across all 72 Football League clubs in the 2022-23 season was about £1.1b, 27% of that revenue went to just five parachute clubs.
 
They might not be the same figure then, Pete. Buckingham says in his article he’s seen a leaked document of the club’s finances from May 2025 which show us owing £21.8M in future transfer fee instalments. This is probably a different figure to the £22M in the 23/24 accounts. We’ll find out when the accounts are published for 24/25.

It’s possible the £9M figure in the 23/24 accounts has been increased to £21.8M due to the 24/25 transfer business (instalments for Mehlem, Racioppi, Millar, Burstow, Hughes, Palmer, Belloumi, Kamara, Crooks, Joseph and Matazo).
What you say looks to be the case
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalman II
"In financial documents seen by The Athletic, dated the end of May, Hull still had £21.8million of future transfer commitments"

This doesn't necessarily suggest a leak from the club does it? Do the EFL have lists of this sort of info? Maybe he has a source at the EFL?

Whilst a worrying article, it doesn't really tell us anything we didn't already know. If anything it could be positive as it shows a willingness to sell. I don't dislike Acun but he clearly doesn't have the money or the backers to do what he wants to do.
 
We’ve no more money coming into the club in the form of previous transfer fees, by the way. The fees for Lewis-Potter, Greaves and Philogene have all been settled now except for add-ons. We had to ask Ipswich and Villa to pay the remaining instalments for Greaves and Philogene early as we’re that skint. Other than the TV money due in August, we haven’t got any serious money coming in unless we sell current players.