Tom Ince
- Thread starter roaring tiger
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Our attitude & subsequent performance today was more positive than it was with the squad we had last week.
I wonder if they stuck him up front and punted balls up to him.
tigermaul
Well-Known Member
He's playing in a promotion-chasing team that needs to attack a lot. V different to our situation where most of the time he looked lost and lacked impact. That said, I'm pleased for him and -- as others have said -- it's all good for us.
Completely agree with this, however we could easily use him in his actual position as a winger and use his pace to break on the counter. He is clearly a good player whose scored a lot of goals in the Championship so hopefully long term he could be a good addition to our team.
Does it really? Does it not just prove that Brucey wasn't playing him correctly and that we as a team could have been better off had we done so. There's 2 sides to every coin.
It proves nothing of the sort, all it proves/confirms is that he can score in The Championship - that's no guarantee he'll ever score in the PL.
Bruce was interviewed about Ince, he gave his reasons for letting him go out on loan. It's nothing to do with not 'rating him'. It's that he promised him he would get regular football, as we're out of all the cups and facing a relegation battle, he couldn't guarantee him games. It's not currently a conducive environment chucking a young player that's still finding his feet in the PL.
