Really? Who did because everyone tried to deny any involvement when I asked before.
I believe it was Nick Thompson who originally instigated it and it got the Allam's backing when Bruce said he also wanted it done.
Really? Who did because everyone tried to deny any involvement when I asked before.
Too early to form a firm conclusion, but we were in the east stand, and apart from Stoke singing on occasions, it was among the flattest atmospheres we've had against a noisy side compared to the normal experience. Had they gone ahead, they'd have dwarfed us for noise. north stand was, as predicted,inaudible for most of the game as shown in earlier threads, where each stand thought the other was quiet.
It proved the effort should have been put into waking up the other stands not splitting up the noisy ones.
I feel sorry for the Allams, they got given s**te advice and took it in good faith. Fortunately, they seem to now realise this so hopefully something decent can be salvaged from the wreckage and maybe, get back some of the lost fans.
You bitter old man. What a sack of lies.
For the record there were time both north and East were going in time at the same time stoke fans picked up, and the stoke fans were completely drowned out from south.
It was a roaring success and that fact is non debatable.
I had nothing to do with it, I just posted that to wind you up.![]()

I think this thread clearly proves that's a load of nonsense.


I believe it was Nick Thompson who originally instigated it and it got the Allam's backing when Bruce said he also wanted it done.
I meant the next meeting I'm at(I'm assuming I will get invited back at some point), I know there is another fan group meeting arranged that's a different group to the first two meetings.
The CTWD group have shot themeselves in the foot with their support of this and shown themselves to be run by individuals personal agendas and have less interest in getting the views of fans than Mr Allam is.
Dutch who are these fans who have turnd their back on the club because of the move? Because the only person I ever see whinging about it is you.
If these 'fans' are going to turn their backs on the club because they're sitting somewhere slightly different, they're as bad as those man utd ****s who say they're not watching anymore if 'x' player plays or until the manager gets sacked and we're better off without them.
So if this move truly has got rid of those types it's a huge positive and makes the already enormous success even more successful.
Never heard the North stand so loud (from the West Lower)...Stoke were loud in very small patches but that is to be expected from their away support. Other visiting teams won't have their following this season.
People in the east stand E4 unhappy about sitting next to away fans need to grow a pair! Never been to an away game?
Both misleading statements. Nick Thompson also said it couldn't be done, Steve Bruce diplomatically answered a question put to him about a proposed scheme, yet some try to claim he initiated it.
In either event, the club were given poor advice on what the fans wanted.
It's nothing much to with 'sitting somewhere slightly different'.
People claiming it as a 'success' are actually agreeing the other stand was quiet.
The noisy groups yesterday were the noisy ones from last year, this move has done nothing to alter that. If the move was to improve atmosphere, it's clearly failed so far. Effort should have been on the quiet areas, which are still quiet.
Well done Tiger, I hope you had a good time and got home OK too.Hey Charlie.
I made it to Hull and Back on the train on my own
First solo trip on train since 2007.
Brilliant .
Part down to you been on the coach for the s/f
hugs you and ALL the best ok
Nick Thompson said the SAG said it couldn't be done, it obviously could, as it now has been.
The club claim Bruce was very keen for this to happen, I've no idea if they're making it up, I've not actually spoken to Bruce about it.