Pearson, Bruce, Phelan... all defensive minded managers.
It says a lot about Phelan's capability when, with a limited transfer budget, he spent £18 in positions we didn't need to strengthen, in the process weakening our starting XI and leaving us without adequate cover at right back or up front.
It says a lot about Phelan's capability when, with a limited transfer budget, he spent £18 in positions we didn't need to strengthen, in the process weakening our starting XI and leaving us without adequate cover at right back or up front.
the positions at right back and left back were caused last year by getting rid of Rosie, Macca. Figeroa and Brady at the start of the season and only buying Odubajo and Clucas - although Clucas is not a really a left back and Odubajo is out all season- most of this seasons targets were Brucies targets passed to Ehab to buy - Ehab carried out most of Brucies wishes after he ****ed off after the row about losing Powell - Mason, Keane and Marshall were all Brucies targets - Phelan is essentially having to deal with the mess he was left - as far as our attack is concerned who exactly do we have Diomande isn't good enough in attack and should never have been bought because he was injured when he bought him as was Powell - again, well done Brucie - Hernandez had already proved he isn't a premier league striker the last time we were in the Prem - I agree Phelan isn't the man for the job but he's having to deal with the mess he was left - no-one else wanted the job and whether anyone likes it or not, Phelan has got more points on the board than Bruce did for the same fixtures and he's got us to the EFL semi-final - no-one is more frustrated and angry about the situation than I am but pointing the finger solely at Phelan is not right - the lions share of this mess is the Allams because of the lack of investment , next is Bruce for putting together a **** team filled with players not good enough at Prem level and then Phelan who should have walked when offered the job and left no-one in charge because no-one wanted the poison chalice
New owners would get a new manager
we need new owners before the middle of january for a new manager to get some additions
that's our only hope
Don't worry it's just Charon with his Bruce addiction. Brucey either shagged his mrs or nicked his pen.So Ehab bought the players Bruce wanted after he forced him out. Bull ****!
It says a lot about Phelan's capability when, with a limited transfer budget, he spent £18 in positions we didn't need to strengthen, in the process weakening our starting XI and leaving us without adequate cover at right back or up front.
Well if Bruce nicked his pen, Charon should've twatted him.Don't worry it's just Charon with his Bruce addiction. Brucey either shagged his mrs or nicked his pen.
the positions at right back and left back were caused last year by getting rid of Rosie, Macca. Figeroa and Brady at the start of the season and only buying Odubajo and Clucas - although Clucas is not a really a left back and Odubajo is out all season- most of this seasons targets were Brucies targets passed to Ehab to buy - Ehab carried out most of Brucies wishes after he ****ed off after the row about losing Powell - Mason, Keane and Marshall were all Brucies targets - Phelan is essentially having to deal with the mess he was left - as far as our attack is concerned who exactly do we have Diomande isn't good enough in attack and should never have been bought because he was injured when he bought him as was Powell - again, well done Brucie - Hernandez had already proved he isn't a premier league striker the last time we were in the Prem - I agree Phelan isn't the man for the job but he's having to deal with the mess he was left - no-one else wanted the job and whether anyone likes it or not, Phelan has got more points on the board than Bruce did for the same fixtures and he's got us to the EFL semi-final - no-one is more frustrated and angry about the situation than I am but pointing the finger solely at Phelan is not right - the lions share of this mess is the Allams because of the lack of investment , next is Bruce for putting together a **** team filled with players not good enough at Prem level and then Phelan who should have walked when offered the job and left no-one in charge because no-one wanted the poison chalice
Why would anyone think that Phelan decided where to spend that money?
Remember we signed all these player in the last two minutes of the window. Bruce left because he wasn't allowed to sign anyone. He wanted Nick Powell and Robson-Kanu and wasn't even allowed to sign those two. Ehab took things into his own hands because thought he could get Rashford on loan. Even in last night's interviews after the game, Davies was bemoaning the lack of transfer activity in the summer.
Phelan said repeatedly he'd give a list of targets in.It does seem a huge coincidence that the players we where linked with i.e Mason and Henrikson before Bruce left where eventually signed. I highly doubt they where Phelan's prime targets. I imagine them two along with Marshall where players targeted before Bruce left, and we left it far to late to look at any other targets.
Do you really think Phelan chose to sign all his players on the last day of the window? Do we really think Phelan would of refused to sign a striker if he had the money to do so? I doubt it.
I am not trying to defend Phelan as I disagree with his setup and his tactics, as we have shown against West Brom and Southampton if we actually attack teams we can take points, however, to then ignore that and sit back for 70 minutes is idiotic. It has happened far to often for it to not be linked to Phelan.
However, I won't lay the blame totally at his door, as I reckon if he was allowed to sign 5/6 players of his choice with a decent budget in the window they would of been vary different.
We can all disagree about the name change and everything else the Allams have done, but to basically handicap our Premier League season and leave all our signings to the last minute is disgraceful.
Even if it had only been £18 it's starting to look like we were done!It says a lot about Phelan's capability when, with a limited transfer budget, he spent £18 in positions we didn't need to strengthen, in the process weakening our starting XI and leaving us without adequate cover at right back or up front.