Yes, yes, followed by the "T" word, but how long since the club's used our name to advertise a match?
You must log in or register to see media
It says Hull City Tigers.
As it says Burton Albion.
Yes I think that's where I am too. It's an obvious compromise and has a sting in the tail, but it is a concession from the Allam machine that all too rarely gives concessions.It's obviously an attempt to placate the fans, while Ehab thinks he's still cleverly using his beloved Hull City Tigers.
Still, it's an improvement.
It's obviously an attempt to placate the fans, while Ehab thinks he's still cleverly using his beloved Hull City Tigers.
Still, it's an improvement.
Because it says Hull City, whereas previously it didn't. Cup half full or cup half empty - or maybe more accurately, cup mostly empty or cup with puddle of stagnant water in it.I know I'm PLT and therefore always furious etc etc but how is this a good thing? It clearly says Hull City Tigers. This is exactly what we've been complaining about for years.
Because it says Hull City, whereas previously it didn't. Cup half full or cup half empty - or maybe more accurately, cup mostly empty or cup with puddle of stagnant water in it.
Because it says Hull City, whereas previously it didn't. Cup half full or cup half empty - or maybe more accurately, cup mostly empty or cup with puddle of stagnant water in it.
Indeed it does. Which is either better or worse than "The Tigers" or a stupid badge, which they've used previously. It's very far from perfect, but to some it might be a little better.It says Hull City Tigers, over two lines. In the same way they've done Burton Albion.
How come they can get it right on twitter , wrong on the website etc.
From a marketing point of view it's all over the place when we have such a simple and memorable name
Indeed it does. Which is either better or worse than "The Tigers" or a stupid badge. It's very far from perfect, but to some it might be a little better.