They've only gone and used our name

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The Omega Man said:
I had to think hard to recall that tickets for Hull City would have AFC on them. Or did they? That's my point Hull City, not a badge not. Hull Tigers. Perhaps I think that our support is more fickle than you.
I spend time talking to supporters before games, you are wrong. Hardly any support the use of Hull Tigers, but there are plenty who would not do anything to stop it. I would say they would see Hull City and not notice Tigers until it was pointed out, just like I cannot recall what it said on the tickets, except that it said Hull City.
Click to expand...

You've obviously not been on Twitter tonight, City are being torn a new one.

Whatever support their might have been for a compromise option, it died a miserable death quite some time ago and you've read this completely wrong.

In fact, I dare you to propose Hull City Tigers on the OSC account and see what happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton
The Omega Man said:
I had to think hard to recall that tickets for Hull City would have AFC on them. Or did they? That's my point Hull City, not a badge not. Hull Tigers. Perhaps I think that our support is more fickle than you.
I spend time talking to supporters before games, you are wrong. Hardly any support the use of Hull Tigers, but there are plenty who would not do anything to stop it. I would say they would see Hull City and not notice Tigers until it was pointed out, just like I cannot recall what it said on the tickets, except that it said Hull City.
Click to expand...
Check this seasons home attendances, then get back to me.

Sorry mate, but you misread events.
 
We're called Hull City, absolutely everyone (other than two dipshits) wants us to be referred to as Hull City, nobody is demanding we're referred to as Hull City AFC all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton
The Omega Man said:
It might well be bollocks, but it is just what I posted in the past.
It might be bollocks but, you know and everyone knows that it is a compromise that many will accept.
It might be bollocks but it's a step forward and not a step backwards.
Click to expand...

Is it **** and you know it. Sold your soul to the devil. Are you still the Communications man for the OSC?
 
originallambrettaman said:
You've obviously not been on Twitter tonight, City are being torn a new one.

Whatever support their might have been for a compromise option, it died a miserable death quite some time ago and you've read this completely wrong.

In fact, I dare you to propose Hull City Tigers on the OSC account and see what happens.
Click to expand...
You said it was an improvement and according to your reply there was perhaps support for Hull City Tigers.
I am saying that the use of City is a step forward in the way games had been advertised. Better than Tigers vs Burton Albion.
Why would I propose anything like a change to the name on the OSC account? It's not something we would do. We use Hull City, City or The Tigers and have no need or desire to change.
I find it odd that you have the urge to bring the OSC into this anyway.
 
The Omega Man said:
You said it was an improvement and according to your reply there was perhaps support for Hull City Tigers.
I am saying that the use of City is a step forward in the way games had been advertised. Better than Tigers vs Burton Albion.
Why would I propose anything like a change to the name on the OSC account? It's not something we would do. We use Hull City, City or The Tigers and have no need or desire to change.
I find it odd that you have the urge to bring the OSC into this anyway.
Click to expand...

I'm pleased to see Hull City used, now we just need the Tigers nonsense to stop being used with it.

I challenged you to ask if people if they happy to accept Hull City Tigers as a compromise on the OSC account, as I don't think you actually believe the bollocks you've posted on here and, in reality, you know full well that if you posed that question, you'd get crucified.
 
The Omega Man said:
My view remains that many would accept the compromise.
Click to expand...
The Omega Man said:
My view remains that many would accept the compromise.
Click to expand...
I was commenting on you saying it was a step in the right direction, I don't think it is

I'm sure some would accept it as a compromise, some would have accepted the name change in the first place. However I still think it is a step backwards (and flaunting a FA ruling...as usual)
 
originallambrettaman said:
I'm pleased to see Hull City used, now we just need the Tigers nonsense to stop being used with it.

I challenged you to ask if people if they happy to accept Hull City Tigers as a compromise on the OSC account, as I don't believe you actually believe the bollocks you've posted on here and, in reality, you know full well that if you posed that question, you'd get crucified.
Click to expand...
I would be crucified for posting the question as it is not something that we get involved with.
You know that though. What about HCST will you get back involved and lead the protest?
 
dennisboothstash said:
I was commenting on you saying it was a step in the right direction, I don't think it is

I'm sure some would accept it as a compromise, some would have accepted the name change in the first place. However I still think it is a step backwards (and flaunting a FA ruling...as usual)
Click to expand...
It has to be better than just Tigers vs Burton Albion.
 
The Omega Man said:
I would be crucified for posting the question as it is not something that we get involved with.
You know that though. What about HCST will you get back involved and lead the protest?
Click to expand...

**** all's changed, just more of the same **** we've had for the past few years, why would I change my opinion on anything now?
 
originallambrettaman said:
**** all's changed, just more of the same **** we've had for the past few years, why would I change my opinion on anything now?
Click to expand...
Come and see for yourself what we do, who is running the OSC. Find out what we aim to do and what we are doing now. If you think nothing has changed, well I am sorry but you are wrong.
 
The Omega Man said:
Come and see for yourself what we do, who is running the OSC. Find out what we aim to do and what we are doing now. If you think nothing has changed, well I am sorry but you are wrong.
Click to expand...

Eh?

You asked me if I was going to start leading protests for the Trust, I'm not involved and **** all has changed to get me involved, I've no idea why you think that comment had anything at all to do with the OSC.
 
Kempton said:
So you can't say who would crucify you for that.

It's blindingly obvious who gags you Mel.
Click to expand...
I have never had any conversation with anyone involved with the club that has required me to promote the use of Hull City Tigers or Hull Tigers. I do not have direct contact with the club or attend meetings with the club. In the last two years I have only been to the clubs office once. No one on the current board of the OSC has ever to my knowledge discussed the use of the name of the club. We use Hull City and The Tigers in our everyday output. Sometimes of it is needed we use Hull City AFC and no one at the club asks us to change anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back