The Third Meeting.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If what @Obadiah said is true, about the owners having a buyer lined up for when they were given the freehold for next to nothing, then I think we can all agree that it was never a gift, just a business decision that went wrong.

That's been clear for a long time; although for some of the evangelists on here it took quite a time to sink in. I makes me laugh when I see posters pillioring MoH on here, when we have long standing trolls who change their tune without question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MingofHarlem
Maybe I’ve misremembered the timeframes, but I couldn’t understand that if there was a buyer lined up so quickly why that buyer didn’t just look to get the club from the start by speaking to the Council about the freehold (of course that might have stopped them anyway, but why wait and have to give the Alllams a slice?)

Perhaps the Allams moved quickly (we have seen that since) and took the opportunity that they had the inside lane on - it was always puzzling why such diligent businessmen carried out their due diligence in a rushed and incomplete manner.
 
I totally disagree and I will give you the benefit of the doubt though you are coming across as a troll which in the current situation we are in it's not funny or clever.

I am certainly no caveman as you put it but the best and only action that should take place during the upcoming televised games is that supporter's enter the pitch and stop the game and have it abandoned it will give us huge press coverage and very importantly embarrass those ****s in charge.

Let's hope others don't share your opinion.
 
According to Allam he was promised the freehold. If he paid for it he wouldn't have made any profit so why would he do that? Especially if he was promised the freehold as a quid pro quo for saving the club.

He's a lying twat. I don't believe anything he says. Do you really?
 
No the art is letting people believe you are going to do what they want, even when you’re not
Or the art of extrapolating something from the meeting that you want to no matter what was said.
Or in the case of the Allams downright lying about what happened at the meeting to discredit the council and believe that the fans would be on your side !!
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash
So Brady could have made him believe that was what he was going to do......
It was tongue in cheek and referring more to politics in general
A sensible businessman (as opposed to an average voter) should be more switched on anyway, but I absolutely don’t think Brady would have even got close to promising it
 
  • Like
Reactions: howdentiger
So you think I wasn't telling the truth when I said Brady was capable of telling Assem Allam he could have the stadium freehold?

I think the claim that Brady told Allam he could have the stadium is bollocks, I think Allam having another buyer lined up to sell the club straight on to after he got the stadium is also bollocks.