The Third Meeting.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Walter Sobchak said:
  • The name change and everything that went with it – common, lousy, irrelevant, die when we want, no business case etc.
  • The new badge.
  • The refusal to use our proper name or even acceptance what our name is and the whitewashing of our history.
  • ‘24 hours’, ‘football should be like air’ and all the other ****e remarks.
  • The rigged referendum with loaded questions.
  • The ‘gift’ the people of Hull – with interest.
  • The use of the ASI fund
  • £10 mill standard fee fire sale asset stripping
  • The removal of concessions driving away the long standing support and the hope of a new generation of support.
  • Airco arena evictions.
  • Closing parts of the ground and moving others about.
  • The treatment of Barmby, Bruce, Phelan, Slutsky.
  • Blaming the fans for literally anything that happens i.e the lack of sale, a poor result and so on.
  • Dividing the fans and the city.
  • The bodged sacking of the groundsmen.
  • The refusal to cooperate with the IFO regarding the membership scheme and breaching premier league rules.
  • The pettiness of removing Hull City Council sign.
  • The whoring of Dean Windass.
  • GateGate.
  • Threatening to move the club out of the city if they didn’t get their own way, despite the fact that directly contradicted their own claims about a gift to the community
  • Cancelling meetings with supporters based on disingenuous reasons and accusing supporter groups of threatening behavior (arf) due to being backed into a corner
The list is getting longer by the day.
Click to expand...


charging Hull FC to put photos on the wall
 
Walter Sobchak said:
  • The name change and everything that went with it – common, lousy, irrelevant, die when we want, no business case etc.
  • The new badge.
  • The refusal to use our proper name or even acceptance what our name is and the whitewashing of our history.
  • ‘24 hours’, ‘football should be like air’ and all the other ****e remarks.
  • The rigged referendum with loaded questions.
  • The ‘gift’ the people of Hull – with interest.
  • The use of the ASI fund
  • £10 mill standard fee fire sale asset stripping
  • The removal of concessions driving away the long standing support and the hope of a new generation of support.
  • Airco arena evictions.
  • Closing parts of the ground and moving others about.
  • The treatment of Barmby, Bruce, Phelan, Slutsky.
  • Blaming the fans for literally anything that happens i.e the lack of sale, a poor result and so on.
  • Dividing the fans and the city.
  • The bodged sacking of the groundsmen.
  • The refusal to cooperate with the IFO regarding the membership scheme and breaching premier league rules.
  • The pettiness of removing Hull City Council sign.
  • The whoring of Dean Windass.
  • GateGate.
  • Threatening to move the club out of the city if they didn’t get their own way, despite the fact that directly contradicted their own claims about a gift to the community
  • Cancelling meetings with supporters based on disingenuous reasons and accusing supporter groups of threatening behavior (arf) due to being backed into a corner
The list is getting longer by the day.
Click to expand...

Thorough list. But what do you mean by the
“whoring of Dean Windass”?

MoH
 
dennisboothstash said:
What did happen to John Cooper?
Click to expand...

Let's just say he left on very bitter terms after it became clear that they didn't value someone who had won numerous Groundsman of the Year awards, had turned down numerous offers from bigger clubs easier on in his career, had overseen much of the successful move to the KC and had been working miracles on a very tight budget at the KC under the Allams. He wasn't the only member of the backroom staff who the Allams were to treat poorly, however.
 
RichardG said:
Let's just say he left on very bitter terms after it became clear that they didn't value someone who had won numerous Groundsman of the Year awards, had turned down numerous offers from bigger clubs easier on in his career, had overseen much of the successful move to the KC and had been working miracles on a very tight budget at the KC under the Allams. He wasn't the only member of the backroom staff who the Allams were to treat poorly, however.
Click to expand...
That’s crap
I had several dealings with him through work and he always seemed very knowledgable
 
  • Like
Reactions: RichardG
originallambrettaman said:
Yesterday was the third meeting, they were given the scarves at the start of the first meeting, it quite obviously wasn't a reason to cancel.

Neither was the previous days article.

They just came up with a bogus reason, as they'd run out of excuses for not actually implementing anything.
Click to expand...

That is the point exactly. Why wait so bloody long if his feelings had been hurt.
 
MingofHarlem said:
Bogus or otherwise, giving the scarves and publishing the article were “open goals” to the Allams. Open goals that they readily took. That is the frustration here. If, as DBT had suggested, Ehab used the weather as an excuse (because that is all he had) everyone would rightly dismiss this.

However, despite what the Allams have done during their ownership, there are some who still have objectivity. The scarves were a misstep and we are paying for that now.

MoH
Click to expand...

Are you sure everyone would dismiss it? I aren't sure at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back