Breaking News...
Alistair Campbell has been expelled from the Liberal Democratic Party after declaring his backing for one of the Tory leadership hopefuls.
Did he last more than 45 minutes with them?...
Breaking News...
Alistair Campbell has been expelled from the Liberal Democratic Party after declaring his backing for one of the Tory leadership hopefuls.
In the Green Room with our fabulous speakers at this evening’s @UKStopTrump mobilisation meeting @OwenJones84 @AyoCaesar @MayaGoodfellow @miqdaad @Orangutan_Lady @graciemaybe @zarahsultana @aliyayule @UKSCN1 @DawnButlerBrent @chilledasad100 #CarnivalOfResistance #StopTrumpismpic.twitter.com/rf1DdVsm8V
You must log in or register to see images
As a remainer who thinks we have to honour the referendum result, I think your attitude, if it extends to everyone who voted Remain and is agitating to prevent Brexit, through signing petitions, going on marches, posting on here or droning on about it down the pub, is problematic. Let’s say you get your way, as I suspect you will, and we leave on WTO terms, what are you (and by extension hard Brexit politicians) going to do to stop this bile, which is close to hatred, continuing forever? How long do you want to despise your neighbours?
I should add that exactly the same goes for hard core remainers and their feelings about Leavers.
It’s a brilliant example of the limits of parliamentary democracy. Liberalism accepts that disagreement is part of the political process, and that people who disagree profoundly can live together. But eventually, the parliamentary debate does end, and someone gets his way while someone else does not. The state’s job is to provide not the coffeehouse for the debate, but the threat of a beating to compel the loser to accept the result.* We rarely reach this point so explicitly, but Brexit has done it, in glaring, stark HD technicolour. Roughly half the country is going to very clearly ‘lose’, whatever the outcome. It’s usually a smaller proportion of the population, or one with no voice, or a section able to avoid the full consequences of ‘losing’. Can our system of democracy cope with it? Or is Brexit not, in fact, a big or important enough thing to drive us to the edge?
Brexit itself is inherently boring now, but its social and political consequences are genuinely exciting. Who’s interests does the state actually serve when push comes to shove? Ideally or in reality?
* this is an idea stolen from Carl Schmitt, a Nazi philosopher (bit of an oxymoron), which I find it hard to find fault with. I strongly disagree with the conclusions he draws, of course. I found it buried in an Atlantic magazine article about the alt right troll and authentic neo Nazi Richard Spencer, a truly odious specimen.
I assumed it was the balanced panels for BBC's Question Time throughout June
I do t think that programme has any credibility to British politics... in fact it is designed to brainwash us the mob nothing more
Behind everything that is put out in the media there is design of influence of course but the U.K. is without doubt the worse inflicted imo by a long way... and some of us all wonder why we have such a self obsessed nation void of responsibility and full to the brim with blame culture
It will take a sweeping trend over the next few years to get us rid of this crap
The Cons are just about to serve up another recipe of crap imo and many will swallow it all
They are so out of touch it’s criminal and the Labour Party the same
Wishing for radical change that brings us more in line to today’s free thinking politics. The U.K. has to reinvent itself inside or outside of Europe
My viewpoint has always been built around loss of faith in the current state of the U.K. I still do not see us being able to stand alone in business and industry without a union ... the U.K has been in serious decline for 50 years or more and no bullshit speech from any of our political leaders will change that ever ... we are unable to understand revolution it’s that simple
Agree about the 'since then' bit Goldie - in fact you could fill in the missing lines there and say it has done well since joining the EU. By the way - immigration (the European variety) is not 'high' in the UK. There are far more EU. immigrants, as a percentage of population, in other EU. countries such as Germany, France, the Netherlands etc. Just to sober up a little - there are 1.2 million Rumanians in Italy, and 800,000 in Germany. There are 2 reasons why immigration to the UK. is high - the first is language, and the second is that many people think that the chances of getting casual, semi legal, cash in hand jobs is higher there - in addition, there is no real registration there and so many feel they can easily disappear.I don't recognise your characterisation of the UK as a country in decline for 50 years, DT. It was in decline in the 1960's and 70's and lost much of its manufacturing due to uncompetitiveness and industrial dispute. But since, then it has done well, which is why immigration is so high. People want to come and live here. London was/is the fifth biggest French city, after all.
As I said to Stan, if the UK and EU solve the backstop problem, I believe everyone can move forward. Won't be easy to negotiate the free trade agreement, but at least we'll have reached the next stage, the EU can focus on matters that are challenging it, and the UK can start to enter bilaterals with trading partners worldwide
In my post, I distinguish between Remainers and Remoaners, Stan, and acknowledge and greatly respect your position. It mirrors how I would have approached a Remain majority win. Leavers could have revisited the referendum vote in 10 or 20 years time, but until then, the issue was settled. So, now, we have to leave the EU (which includes out of the CU and SM and EU institutions) but in 10 or 20 years time, if there is a campaign to rejoin, then fine. This whole concept that if you vote for the Brexit Party, you are "rabid" as one poster has said, is simply bad loserism.
I see Bercow, who is meant to be politically impartial, is now staying on as Speaker so he can be politically partial. How long before he is attacked (politically) for bringing his office into disrepute.
Interesting this morning, that even the BBC is reporting that some EU leaders are saying in private that the Irish backstop pushed the UK too far. If they solve that one, everyone moves on.
Agree about the 'since then' bit Goldie - in fact you could fill in the missing lines there and say it has done well since joining the EU. By the way - immigration (the European variety) is not 'high' in the UK. There are far more EU. immigrants, as a percentage of population, in other EU. countries such as Germany, France, the Netherlands etc. Just to sober up a little - there are 1.2 million Rumanians in Italy, and 800,000 in Germany. There are 2 reasons why immigration to the UK. is high - the first is language, and the second is that many people think that the chances of getting casual, semi legal, cash in hand jobs is higher there - in addition, there is no real registration there and so many feel they can easily disappear.
My post wandered a bit, though your response confirms we have a mountain to climb to get back to any sense of civility, on both sides, no matter what the outcome. Remainers/Remoaners and Leavers/rabid Brexiters have sincere and completely incompatible beliefs. And their numbers are roughly equal. I’m not really interested in the technicalities of Brexit (though they will doubtless impact my life), more in what kind of country I will see out my life in.
I was actually even more interested in who’s interests you (and anyone else) think the State, in a liberal democracy like ours, serves, both ideally and in reality. I’m testing a theory.
OK, cheers. Do you think the State actually delivers this?That last paragraph could be an Oxbridge examination question! In my view, the state should serve the populace, and provide a platform for individuals to make the most of their talents and proclivity for hard work and be successful in whatever they do, at the same time, providing a safety net for those who for reasons like unemployment and ill-health, fall on hard times. That's a narrow definition and the best I can do in 3 lines.
He’ll instigate a round of cuts.
The first will no doubt be the deepest.
OK, cheers. Do you think the State actually delivers this?
I do accept it always have and here we are still in the EU ... looks like I was right all along
No deal will never happen
I don't recognise your characterisation of the UK as a country in decline for 50 years, DT. It was in decline in the 1960's and 70's and lost much of its manufacturing due to uncompetitiveness and industrial dispute. But since, then it has done well, which is why immigration is so high. People want to come and live here. London was/is the fifth biggest French city, after all.
As I said to Stan, if the UK and EU solve the backstop problem, I believe everyone can move forward. Won't be easy to negotiate the free trade agreement, but at least we'll have reached the next stage, the EU can focus on matters that are challenging it, and the UK can start to enter bilaterals with trading partners worldwide
It succeeds at least as well as any other country on earth. Of course, nothing is perfect. There are the disgustingly rich, and the deserving poor. But at present, the rich do pay a huge whack of tax. More needs to be done to help poorer children achieve their potential in life, though the state can only do so much and parents must take on that responsibility (and most do).
If you have some talent and work hard, you can achieve great things in this country.
I would say London is now a country of its own Goldie it’s the best city in the world imo
It’s the large towns I fear are all becoming very much the same
It’s about money sadly and imo everything in the modern U.K. comes from the origin of London
I agree totally that if the deal is solved then of course why not ? What I cannot see at the moment is exactly how this will happen ... a no deal will be truly awful for some areas of the U.K.
London will be fine whatever happens but with so many industries outside the U.K. we will be in a poorer position . Madness to think that a divided nation with the current culture will care about everyone
Makes little difference to me as it’s time to move on regardless except a no deal must not be allowed to happen
Been to Newcastle recently? It’s ****ing brilliant, I love it. Though I don’t like them quite as much Birmingham, Liverpool and Bristol all have distinctive feels. Edinburgh and Glasgow- and to a lesser extent Cardiff - you are in a different country. Sure, the big shops are all the same and there is too much glass at ground level, but these places have clear, individual character.I would say London is now a country of its own Goldie it’s the best city in the world imo
It’s the large towns I fear are all becoming very much the same
It’s about money sadly and imo everything in the modern U.K. comes from the origin of London
I agree totally that if the deal is solved then of course why not ? What I cannot see at the moment is exactly how this will happen ... a no deal will be truly awful for some areas of the U.K.
London will be fine whatever happens but with so many industries outside the U.K. we will be in a poorer position . Madness to think that a divided nation with the current culture will care about everyone
Makes little difference to me as it’s time to move on regardless except a no deal must not be allowed to happen
Which is why he has no chance of winning.I don't think I'd heard of Rory Stewart before which says more about me than him. But having seen a few interviews he seems to be that rare commodity a Tory MP who appears to have an ounce of genuine compassion and empathy.