The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, because importing millions of people from countries that have inhuman cultures has zero effect on the societies they move to. Does your colon look healthy? I imagine you'd be able to tell me considering you have your head up your ass so often.

You ignorant little turd.

Inhuman cultures!??.. thanks for just confirming what dreadful little Nazi boy you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
You ignorant little turd.

Inhuman cultures!??.. thanks for just confirming what dreadful little Nazi boy you are.
In Sharia 'courts' like the little ones popping up all over our country, the word of a woman is only worth half of that of a man's, this is inhuman. Would you disagree?
 
In Sharia 'courts' like the little ones popping up all over our country, the word of a woman is only worth half of that of a man's, this is inhuman. Would you disagree?
It's not inhuman, by the very definition of it. It's created by humans.
The word that you're looking for is unjust.

Just so that there's no confusion about this, as I've seen it raised repeatedly elsewhere, Sharia courts have no jurisdiction in the UK.
They're a voluntary way of fixing disputes between parties that agree to attend them.
There's been a Jewish equivalent for centuries, apparently.
 
In Sharia 'courts' like the little ones popping up all over our country, the word of a woman is only worth half of that of a man's, this is inhuman. Would you disagree?

Those courts have no legal power and are currently being investigated by the Gvt.

Of course a woman is not worth less than a man. I disagree with Muslims who believe that. But there are numerous things in both the Catholic and the Anglican faith that I disagree with too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Doubling the share of the vote in a constituency that has always been Tory is quite significant. If their share of the vote was doubled everywhere they'd have 16% and probably quite a few more seats.

That I understand, but they still have nothing so its easy to gain a few seats and get an extra 5%
 
You must log in or register to see media
Will Self is the left now, then? I thought that he was just one random author with no power whatsoever.

Nice to see Ol' Nige' turning up for Question Time again, though.
He's had more appearances on it than anyone else, other than Dimbleby himself.
That's not including the two times that he was too lazy and feckless to turn up.
He's probably been on their set more times than he's actually attended the job that he's paid for out of taxpayer's pockets.
 
Will Self is the left now, then? I thought that he was just one random author with no power whatsoever.

Nice to see Ol' Nige' turning up for Question Time again, though.
He's had more appearances on it than anyone else, other than Dimbleby himself.
That's not including the two times that he was too lazy and feckless to turn up.
He's probably been on their set more times than he's actually attended the job that he's paid for out of taxpayer's pockets.
https://www.theguardian.com/culture...oscar-wilde-champagne-socialist-voting-labour
 
It's not inhuman, by the very definition of it. It's created by humans.
The word that you're looking for is unjust.

Just so that there's no confusion about this, as I've seen it raised repeatedly elsewhere, Sharia courts have no jurisdiction in the UK.
They're a voluntary way of fixing disputes between parties that agree to attend them.
There's been a Jewish equivalent for centuries, apparently.
It doesn't really work like that, humans are capable of being inhuman, this is demonstrated by women being treated as lesser people than men in Islam.

I know they have no legal jurisdiction, but they are still allowed to operate and I am willing to bet that nothing serious will done about them, they have enough support to continue and will undoubtedly be used as another tool for the UK to help Muslims 'integrate'. I think I'd disagree with the whole 'voluntary' element of it too, considering the whole issue with forced marriages and what not.
 
Those courts have no legal power and are currently being investigated by the Gvt.

Of course a woman is not worth less than a man. I disagree with Muslims who believe that. But there are numerous things in both the Catholic and the Anglican faith that I disagree with too.
We forget the wider picture, the cultures that these people are coming from very much adhere to this sort of system, this has a negative effect on the countries that those people will then move to.

First part of your second sentence is very Islamophobic and racist. And when all else fails just talk about other religions...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.