The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
They're desperately trying to hide boring Stan's pleasure in the death and suffering of the migrants, rather than have to be honest and condemn him as they would do if 'the other side' posted similar.

It was posted to take the piss out of those who revel in anti-immigrant stories.
 
It was posted to take the piss out of those who revel in anti-immigrant stories.

No excuse. There's been less offensive pictures used by accident that caused greater indignation.

I don't see any of those calling for tighter controls talikng pleasure in the suffering or using it for pathetic attmepts to point score.

Your support and defense of his words are shameful.
 
No excuse. There's been less offensive pictures used by accident that caused greater indignation.

I don't see any of those calling for tighter controls talikng pleasure in the suffering or using it for pathetic attmepts to point score.

Your support and defense of his words are shameful.

Pete and Zlatan do nothing but try to point score by slagging off immigrants at every opportunity.

I'm defending his words because he's not taking joy in the fact the story occurred. He's using it to mock the ridiculous xenophobia shown by your mates (but not you because you don't ever agree with them, of course). You aren't actually offended by it but are just using it to try and score points yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes and NSIS
They're desperately trying to hide boring Stan's pleasure in the death and suffering of the migrants, rather than have to be honest and condemn him as they would do if 'the other side' posted similar.
They

<laugh>
 
No excuse. There's been less offensive pictures used by accident that caused greater indignation.

I don't see any of those calling for tighter controls talikng pleasure in the suffering or using it for pathetic attmepts to point score.

Your support and defense of his words are shameful.
Outstanding faux outrage <laugh>

If you'd stumbled on that article independently, your reaction would have been "so what". You're too cowardly to openly admit it but through your hundreds of cut and paste posts defending the far right and your constant crawling up the arses of the bigots who aren't afraid to admit to their prejudices, it's obvious what you are.
 
Last edited:
The owner of the "Really British" shop was on Daily Politics today
He said he has had no relationship with politics (except for being asked to stand as a Lib Den councillor)
I got the feeling that the shop would be better if it was in central London rather than Muswell Hill
 
Shameful defence of sad sack stan the xenophobe.

Sadly, it's not surprising to see who tries to justify it and defend him.
The irony being it's you who's actually exploiting that article to score points.

Because you're a coward.

You'll sneak a few likes off of the self confessed white supremacists though. They appreciate your support <laugh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.