The EU debate - Part III

What sort of sad **** would think using people suffering and dying was an acceptable way to make a snide point on a message forum.

There's plenty enough in the sentence to find real issues. What about those trading in the suffering, or those that created the situations many of them are fleeing from, or those that do little to discourage it, which leaves the even more vulnerable still suffering in the danger zones?

 

I didn't say it was the sole reason, and it's dumb to deny such a simple fact. Your 'indication' is just guesswork.

 

Did you think my post was directed at you? I didn't tag or name you.

Enlightening.

 

I knew it wasn't targeted at me because it doesn't relate to my way of thinking in any way, shape or form.

Mine was certainly targeted at you though.

 

But you felt compelled to reply in a very defensive manner.

Gotcha.

Literally

 

Dull, did the missus leave a note when she scarpered?

 

Nope, I replied in an offensive manner to a sad **** that thinks tragedies are fair game for pathetic attempts at point scoring.

No doubt a few on here will shamefully not condemn you, or worse, defend you for it.

 

They?

 

There's nothing to defend. Pete had an extra boiled egg this morning in celebration.

 

The ostrich delivered.

 

The Daily Saxton focuses on the important issues of today

Pomp and ceremony: We reveal the history and grandeur of the tiaras, garters, gowns and medals the Royal Family wore to dazzle ambassadors at a usually secret Buckingham Palace reception

 

The Daily Kustard's at it as well.

THE MAGNIFICENT SIX: Royals pose for historic photo as Kate wears Princess Diana's tiara

 

If you do not assume that it was the sole reason then it makes your claim even dumber as you have nothing to support it.
There is no simple fact unless you assume that all the people of Richmond voted on a single issue. You can claim it affected the vote, but that's as far as it goes.

 

No fat arse, I've seen you and your entire life, from your home to your entire CV, as well as reading your idiotic and simplistic views that you've been spoon fed by the Billionaire owned right wing media. So I can assure you that in no way, shape or form are you superior to me. Hope that helps

 

How do you work that out?

Richmond was won by the Lib Dems who are saying they'll vote against invoking article 50.

You're as clueless as Kustard

 

The theory, stupidly, is that 69% voted Remain but only 50% voted for Olney so that's a kicking for Remain. It's the sort of line you'd expect Kustard to come out with.

 

Brilliant.

What a Dull ****wit

 

What a dumb ****

By that logic Leave took an absolute pounding in Sleaford, the only party that gained ground in terms of their share of the vote was the Lib Dems.

 

+5% of nothing is nothing

 

WTF you talking about, cupcake?