There was never a "charge" for glass bottles. A refund, yes. Yes, there once was recycling of glass before recycling was a buzzword.
oh I always thought it was included in the price and you got that back if you returned the bottle
There was never a "charge" for glass bottles. A refund, yes. Yes, there once was recycling of glass before recycling was a buzzword.
this makes me want to bang my head against a wall. Not because of you St B, but because the message is just not been received out there.
Plastic can be recycled no matter what colour it is.
The media are a disgrace as they are misinforming everyone. It is time they started to turn on the governments and focus on the real solution which is getting recycling done correctly, following better education (or help) for the public. It’s really not difficult
he is good, but I still take exception to his mistake (or deliberate oversight) on plastic bottles. If he had played fair in that I’d have had more respect for him.
yes, too low a % of plastic bottles become recycled back into plastic bottles, but they do end up back recycled in other plastic applications.
See above post. If government laid down the law and helped people learn how and what to recycle, we could recycle it all.
this makes me want to bang my head against a wall. Not because of you St B, but because the message is just not been received out there.
Plastic can be recycled no matter what colour it is.
The media are a disgrace as they are misinforming everyone. It is time they started to turn on the governments and focus on the real solution which is getting recycling done correctly, following better education (or help) for the public. It’s really not difficult
Well that's a refund.oh I always thought it was included in the price and you got that back if you returned the bottle
A charge is like watching commercial TV and thinking it is free. It isn't. Every time you buy anything you are paying more for it because of commercial TV. That's a charge on top.Ok fair enough.......
Sure, you may have been charged a penny extra, which was built into the price. But you were incentivised to bring the bottle back and be refunded the penny. An actual charge does not include an incentive to get money back. It's not the same thing.Yes, but if you bought a crate of lemonade. If you didn’t hand in a crate of empties you would be charged another 3 bob back in the day. (from my school days sat working in the accounts) Is that not considered a charge? I agree it was a kind of a refund. Reality is probably we are both talking from different angles I think.
Sure, you may have been charged a penny extra, which was built into the price. But you were incentivised to bring the bottle back and be refunded the penny. An actual charge does not include an incentive to get money back. It's not the same thing.
Yep, I just about remember that too. However, even deposits are sometimes non-refundable. But good point on that old case.ive just managed to get an old diary down. The charge was called a deposit. The deposit was refunded on the return of the bottles. The lemonade was 1s and 9 pence with a bottle exchange but 2 bob with out.
We have a can deposit. Rarely see them on the streets. I often see people looking through the trash to get out the cans. I wish the deposit was more money and on more cans and bottles. It isn’t on water bottles and now we see many of those on the street.I really cannot see the harm in a deposit scheme. We as kids used to check people’s bins and the like to earn ourselves a few bob. I’m not sure about cans though. I saw somewhere someone said the deposit scheme wouldn’t work as it was too expensive to carry out. For the life of me I cannot understand this?
If it is like renting/leasing acetylene-oxygen tanks for gas welding, then it carries on for the lifetime of use, I believe. You won't face an additional charge for having the bottle longer than anticipated.Several aeons ago I bought a large canister of pressurised propane for the (new) barbecue. I distinctly remember signing an an agreement which meant I was effectively buying a lifetime lease on the canister so I could just trade it for a full one for a relatively small sum. Of course, the British weather being what it is there’s still at least another summer’s worth in the tank, so I have no idea whether the deal still works.
A post above mentioned hardware games against downloadable. Overall, downloadable is cheaper. Ok, that's a fact.
But did you know that the word is out foe people to reduce unnecessary emails? Because they use so much computer and server power. The latest power issue I've heard is that whilst Bitcoin is a marvellous cryptocurrecy, its take up is being slightly restrictedbecause it is power hungry.
Yes, I also realise that it is swings and roundabouts. But it is an appeal originating from Silicon Valley to the amount email traffic that goes on.Swings and roundabouts to me.
Send 10 emails rather than 10 letters to different places, think of the carbon footprint saved (Paper, car to the post box, vans etc).
Also, Computers are so much more efficient over the last few years - especially with the emergence of virtualisation (How did we live with out it - i mean it?). For example our data centre has 5 servers with over 250 virtual servers running on them - 10 years ago that would have been 250 server all running.
Yes, I also realise that it is swings and roundabouts. But it is an appeal originating from Silicon Valley to the amount email traffic that goes on.
The Bitcoin thing is for real though. Apparently it takes a lot of computational power.