There seems to be some confusion as to how Single Transferable Vote works. As most of this confusion is on Pouchy’s part I assume he’s just wumming but for the sake of clarity:
STV means that you rank your preferences in order.
If no first choice gets a clear majority, the least popular option is removed, and those who voted for it as their first choice now have their second choice counted to see if that pushes one of the remaining options over 50%.
By analogy:
Alice, Bob, Chris, Dave and Ed are all in the pub. They try and decide whether to;
1) Stay in the pub all night
2) Go to Vodka Revs which is **** but they know they’ll get in
3) Go to a decent club but risk getting stuck in the rain if there’s a queue.
At first Alice and Bob want to stay in the pub, Chris wants to go to Revs, and Dave and Ed want to go clubbing.
First round:
Pub: A,B
Revs: C
Club: D,E
Nobody has a clear majority so they turn to Chris and say: “look mate, everyone hates revs - we’re obviously not going there. Do you want to go out or not.”
Chris would rather go out than stay in the pub.
Second round of voting:
Pub: A,B
Club: C,D,E
Club has a clear majority so they go out. The “going out” group were not disadvantaged by there being multiple places they could go.
Yes, this is the effectively the same as what I was proposing, though I suggested one vote on two questions. It makes little practical difference which way you do it.
Under the STV system there is usually not 2 rounds of voting, though, but one round with first and second choices picked at the outset.
