Summer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
You must log in or register to see media

Now this does concern me slightly mainly as, if correct, it would explain why Burnley have been bidding in the region they have been.

Based on absolutely nothing beyond wild paranoia, I'd say Ian Harte has a lot to answer for in all of this.

I don't believe a word of that tbh.
 
I don't believe a word of that tbh.
I hope you're right but Fishpaste clearly gets the inside track on what's going on at the club nowadays and I always found him to be a pretty decent bloke so personally don't think he'd make it up (that's not to say that he may not have been fed duff info).
 
You must log in or register to see media

Now this does concern me slightly mainly as, if correct, it would explain why Burnley have been bidding in the region they have been.

Based on absolutely nothing beyond wild paranoia, I'd say Ian Harte has a lot to answer for in all of this.
I am sure I read something from Ian Harte saying every player has a price in relation to Clarke recently, which of course is correct. I know why people think £10m is too low, and it is, but I also think there comes a time when if a player does fancy the move a compromise is probably best. It is all speculation right now, but if we take emotion out of it for a moment based on his form and performances of last season, we probably should expect him to move up a level now.
 
I hope you're right but Fishpaste clearly gets the inside track on what's going on at the club nowadays and I always found him to be a pretty decent bloke so personally don't think he'd make it up (that's not to say that he may not have been fed duff info).

It's not a stretch to believe that these players from PL clubs that we have signed have been told that if PL clubs come back in and safc are not in the PL then they can go. However, it has to meet the clubs evaluation. I don't believe for a second someone has been silly enough to tell Clarke and Harte that 10m was the number.
 
Why on earth would the club settle for that when he has three years left? He was worth £10 million when he was 17, to accept such a low figure would be beyond utterly mental by todays player pricing.
He flopped as a £10m teenager though and his value when we bought him was way lower than that. I think he is worth more than the figures suggested personally, but it isnt as easy as saying we only sell if our valuation is met in my opinion.
 
I am sure I read something from Ian Harte saying every player has a price in relation to Clarke recently, which of course is correct. I know why people think £10m is too low, and it is, but I also think there comes a time when if a player does fancy the move a compromise is probably best. It is all speculation right now, but if we take emotion out of it for a moment based on his form and performances of last season, we probably should expect him to move up a level now.
We should but we should also expect to receive his worth (I appreciate that's subjective and you and I are a bit apart in terms of what we see as his value in the market).
 
I think most fans on this forum have pretty much bought into "The Model" on how the club wants things to progress...in as much, buy young, promising players and SELL when we get suitable offers in. It does make me smile when some of these players start getting noticed and other clubs start placing bids. Some of our fans saying "we can't sell him" We need him to stay" etc etc. Thats not how this model works. Also, the price. If a club offers a certain price and SAFC decide thats acceptable, then the player goes. Sadly we will have this scenario every window if these talented kids turn in great performances on a regular basis...much like Clarke and Ballard. As fans, we have to accept Premier League clubs will cherry pick any of our players if the price is right for them...Not what our fans think the price should be.
 
It's not a stretch to believe that these players from PL clubs that we have signed have been told that if PL clubs come back in and safc are not in the PL then they can go. However, it has to meet the clubs evaluation. I don't believe for a second someone has been silly enough to tell Clarke and Harte that 10m was the number.
They shouldn't have been, I agree, but it would help square the circle for me as to why Burnley's offers have been so derisory which is something I was really struggling to understand.
 
You must log in or register to see media

Now this does concern me slightly mainly as, if correct, it would explain why Burnley have been bidding in the region they have been.

Based on absolutely nothing beyond wild paranoia, I'd say Ian Harte has a lot to answer for in all of this.
Funnily enough I believe all of its a total load of s hite, <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: gillmackem
The danger with the sustainability model...

Ie selling your best players for a profit...

Means remaining very average and not progressing much...
No it doesn't.

You buy 5 players for £2m each (for example). You sell 2 of them for £15m each and now you have £30m to invest in the playing squad (compared to the initial £10m outlay that got you these players in the 1st place)
So, now you are shopping in a slightly better market, for better players than might come in at £10m each, whom you then sell 2 years down the line for £25m each, not to mention selling off the rest of the initial purchases for £10m each and suddenly you have around £80m from your initial £10m investment with which to improve the sqaud still further
 
No it doesn't.

You buy 5 players for £2m each (for example). You sell 2 of them for £15m each and now you have £30m to invest in the playing squad (compared to the initial £10m outlay that got you these players in the 1st place)
So, now you are shopping in a slightly better market, for better players than might come in at £10m each, whom you then sell 2 years down the line for £25m each, not to mention selling off the rest of the initial purchases for £10m each and suddenly you have around £80m from your initial £10m investment with which to improve the sqaud still further

Sounds like pyramid selling, more likely to fail, than not.
 
We have spent money tho, 2nd highest net spend last season and i reckon we must be in the top 5 for net spend so far this summer

The club just wont over spend which is the right thing
I feel a lot of clubs know we need strikers so are asking for more than the real value as which we see it
 
I think most fans on this forum have pretty much bought into "The Model" on how the club wants things to progress...in as much, buy young, promising players and SELL when we get suitable offers in. It does make me smile when some of these players start getting noticed and other clubs start placing bids. Some of our fans saying "we can't sell him" We need him to stay" etc etc. Thats not how this model works. Also, the price. If a club offers a certain price and SAFC decide thats acceptable, then the player goes. Sadly we will have this scenario every window if these talented kids turn in great performances on a regular basis...much like Clarke and Ballard. As fans, we have to accept Premier League clubs will cherry pick any of our players if the price is right for them...Not what our fans think the price should be.
This will keep happening until we go up. So the answer is, with a bit of balance, stay strong enough and replace well enough to go up.
 
We should but we should also expect to receive his worth (I appreciate that's subjective and you and I are a bit apart in terms of what we see as his value in the market).
One of the challenges is we arent on a level playing field. Burnley have the premier league draw. So do Palace and Brentford who have been rumoured to be interested. I can see why Clarke would be interested in a move to any of them. The money will be much better and he will feel he is now ready to take the premier league on. Maybe even get a crack at an England call up. All of those things weigh heavily against us right now. I honestly dont knie if Clarke is feeling miffed or not, he seems like a decent enough lad to me. There might well be a time when he does want to take the opportunity though, and if Burnley think that might be the case they will test our resolve. I just feel in that scenario a compromise deal usually gets sorted, we drop our valuation a bit, they bid a bit higher, extra add on etc.

I also dont know enough about our financial situation. Maybe we are limited on bringing in others until we bring in some money and free up wages.

It is all a balancing act for the club I think and I am speculating they may accept less than they feel he is worth, if other factors are in play.

One thing for sure, if anyone is sold it will be for an offical price tag of 'undisclosed'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.