
c'mon guys, time to kiss and make up here... let's face it, BOTH viewpoints can be considered correct (ie, if we'd conceded less we'd have won more games and if we'd scored more, we'd have won more games)....
We're back to the "glass half full, glass half empty" scenario under a different guise.
Me personally, I'd like to see at least one "experienced" striker come in, just to help the younger ones we have at our disposal out a little... help relieve some of the undoubted pressure they must now be feeling and also to pass on a few tricks of the trade etc.
It's fair to say that none of our current three strikers pose too much of a physical threat to defenders. By this I'm not advocating going back to route one type football, I'm just looking at how often the ball doesn't stick with the likes of Watters or Harris. Both can be effective in their own way (Harris works his butt off and must be a pain for defenders when they have the ball and Watters does take up some good positions/makes some good runs which will occupy defenders minds) but there have been several times where with just a little more guile and know how, we could and should have made more of some of our situations in creating and taking opportunities.
By his own words Steve Morison has talked about the experience we've brought in, despite the young age of some of the players, however up front is now the only area where we have very little experience.... so maybe an "older" head would be good!?
I trust Morison to put it right within the confines of whatever budge we may or may not have and if we can (or conversely can't) attract new players.
I think we can all agree that the football being played is heaps more enjoyable than what we've been used to over the last 4 or 5 years and over time it should get even better. The team is still gelling and we will give someone a hiding at some point... we just need to patient and enjoy it when it comes.