Transfer Rumours Summer Window 2022

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If it's correct, then City would have certainly have had to splash some cash for a permanent deal.
A statement of intent.
I assume a budget has been available all window and take it SM has been wheeling and dealing until he needed to spend.

As interesting will be to see who leaves before the end of the day either permie or on loan.
Whyte a candidate for a permie move?
Harris a loan move?

Wouldnt be surprised if 2 or 3 depart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrizzleBluebird
A statement of intent.
I assume a budget has been available all window and take it SM has been wheeling and dealing until he needed to spend.

As interesting will be to see who leaves before the end of the day either permie or on loan.
Whyte a candidate for a permie move?
Harris a loan move?

Wouldnt be surprised if 2 or 3 depart.

Watters and get another striker in?
 
A statement of intent.
I assume a budget has been available all window and take it SM has been wheeling and dealing until he needed to spend.

As interesting will be to see who leaves before the end of the day either permie or on loan.
Whyte a candidate for a permie move?
Harris a loan move?

Wouldnt be surprised if 2 or 3 depart.

Beeb is saying £1.5M which in this day and age is pretty cheap for a player of his calibre. Still a lot of money for City in the present climate but certainly a statement of intent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: remote
Money is not a problem for Tan but fair play rules are, he is only allowed to convert £19 million a year into shares in order to make us debt free.
 
Beeb is saying £1.5M which in this day and age is pretty cheap for a player of his calibre. Still a lot of money for City in the present climate but certainly a statement of intent.
Just saw that too.
Salary will be another consideration.
Given his experience and having played premier league football, he wont be on a pittance.

I trust SM is balancing the books. Cant imagine Tan letting things get out of hand again.
 
Money is not a problem for Tan but fair play rules are, he is only allowed to convert £19 million a year into shares in order to make us debt free.
Not wanting to interfere with your style Jck, but when you reply to a post, you are able to type below the 'quote' so your response is linked to the post you're replying to rather than it appear as two posts.:emoticon-0148-yes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluefromBridgend