Transfer Rumours Summer Transfer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
The real issue with Henderson (other than the other real issue that has been extensively discussed) is his wages. Surely if he's coming to Sunderland to end his career he can't be expecting anywhere near his current wages of £100,000pw. Granted if he's only on a 1-2 year contract I suppose it doesn't make that much difference as long as its lower than his current wage.
 
The real issue with Henderson (other than the other real issue that has been extensively discussed) is his wages. Surely if he's coming to Sunderland to end his career he can't be expecting anywhere near his current wages of £100,000pw. Granted if he's only on a 1-2 year contract I suppose it doesn't make that much difference as long as its lower than his current wage.
Talk was he's willing to more than half it
 
Let young Riggy and others do all the runnng. Henderson can organise and do all the pointing.

i just feel its incredibly disingenuous of folk and hypocritical to ignore links to Henderson on the argument on legs whilst simultaneously supporting a new deal for Neil. It's been well discussed here that we need pace, power, presence and physicality particularly in midfield and if you neglect Henderson on that basis i dont see how you can support double downing on Neil, who on the back of a 'poor' season overall in a lesser league than the prem, does not have pace, power, or physicality.

Believe Henderson would give us incredible aura in the dressing room and a level of calmness and reliability we will need. That and the fact with Ekwah most likely off and Samed off, jobe off, we've only got Neil, Le Fee and Rigg, so arguably need Henderson +1 at a minimum.
 
i just feel its incredibly disingenuous of folk and hypocritical to ignore links to Henderson on the argument on legs whilst simultaneously supporting a new deal for Neil. It's been well discussed here that we need pace, power, presence and physicality particularly in midfield and if you neglect Henderson on that basis i dont see how you can support double downing on Neil, who on the back of a 'poor' season overall in a lesser league than the prem, does not have pace, power, or physicality.

Believe Henderson would give us incredible aura in the dressing room and a level of calmness and reliability we will need. That and the fact with Ekwah most likely off and Samed off, jobe off, we've only got Neil, Le Fee and Rigg, so arguably need Henderson +1 at a minimum.
Henderson can absolutely still do a good job and would be massive leadership wise on the pitch.
 
i just feel its incredibly disingenuous of folk and hypocritical to ignore links to Henderson on the argument on legs whilst simultaneously supporting a new deal for Neil. It's been well discussed here that we need pace, power, presence and physicality particularly in midfield and if you neglect Henderson on that basis i dont see how you can support double downing on Neil, who on the back of a 'poor' season overall in a lesser league than the prem, does not have pace, power, or physicality.

Believe Henderson would give us incredible aura in the dressing room and a level of calmness and reliability we will need. That and the fact with Ekwah most likely off and Samed off, jobe off, we've only got Neil, Le Fee and Rigg, so arguably need Henderson +1 at a minimum.
Adding Henderson to Neil is my main issue. It's one or the other, if Neil goes then i'm more on board with Henderson, if Neil stays and Henderson arrives we can't really bring in another.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.