Transfer Rumours Summer Transfer Rumour

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
bobmid said:
I would be surprised if we got half of what you reckon for Willock. On last season's form, not one of our players is worth over 2m despite what we think. If they won't sign extensions, sell them for whatever we can get. It ain't gonna be pretty for a few years that's for sure!
Click to expand...

I’ve got quite a lot of L2 grounds to still tick off so that’s something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobmid and Wherever
Hammersmith bookie said:
Not fussed who we sell, as long as we spend the money on replacements. Try and get a bit more for Dykes and get in a striker who puts it in the net more often. If we sell the players but then give Ainsworth **** all to replace them then blame the board not the manager !
Click to expand...

With the FFP situation and no one but maybe Chair moving for decent money I doubt he’ll even have half our meagre sales to re-invest.
 
bobmid said:
I would be surprised if we got half of what you reckon for Willock. On last season's form, not one of our players is worth over 2m despite what we think. If they won't sign extensions, sell them for whatever we can get. It ain't gonna be pretty for a few years that's for sure!
Click to expand...

I think perhaps Chair is worth a little more than the £2m that you suggest. I have seen some of his 22/23 stats which, despite being in a poor team, were at, or near, the top of the league. With more and more clubs doing this sort of research, they are bound to impress someone with a bit of cash to spend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QPR Oslo
Rodney said:
I think perhaps Chair is worth a little more than the £2m that you suggest. I have seen some of his 22/23 stats which, despite being in a poor team, were at, or near, the top of the league. With more and more clubs doing this sort of research, they are bound to impress someone with a bit of cash to spend.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't disagree with you on Chair. I think he's worth more but other clubs know our situation and will exploit it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rodney
jeffranger said:
Millwall make a bid for Dykes up to 2 mill
Click to expand...

I said they'd be in for him, we knocked them back in January but he'll be perfect for them with Tom Bradshaw feeding off him up front. Only a Rangers bid offering Champions League football is likely to stop this. Another in the firesale...
 
footballtransfers.com have Chair market value at £6.7 M and Dykes £3.2 M for what that's worth. That's almost £10 million right there if we can get that, possibly if we can get more than 1 Club interested in each.
 
Essentially we need a bidding war for at least one of the players. Could see a Rangers / Burnley seeing that Millwall bid as still on the cheap side and adding a bit.

Edit - having googled - I can't see anything online about a Dykes bid?
 
The trouble with football these days is that there are too many teams all playing the same style. To you, to me, to you etc; Takes about 10 mins to get the ball into the opposing penalty area and then they face a brick wall because every opposing player has got back to defend. The only way to beat these teams is to break fast with pacey players leaving their goalie exposed ie the long ball out of defence into space behind their defenders. Long spells of boring possession is great when you're in front, but all the time? No thanks. I would much rather see that rapid transition from defence to the back of the opposing net in a few seconds. Don't get me wrong, banging it upfield hopefully is even worse than pit pat but the well timed, well directed long ball behind the defence - nothing they can do about it
 
  • Like
Reactions: MickMack, daverangers, Hammersmith bookie and 3 others
Loveitupthebush said:
Tell me again .Why did we get rid of him?
Click to expand...

0 wins in a dozen or so games and openly derided during Cup defeat to MK Don's didn't help, nor did the fact that he was responsible for bringing in Barton, SWP, Luke Bloody Young, Gabidon, Ferdinand Anton all of whom made us worse than the team that won the championship..... plus sent Clint out on loan, sold Gorkass and Connolly......
I know he was hamstrung by tango and cash but he fecked up big time.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frome-Ranger, daverangers, SW Ranger and 1 other person
Loveitupthebush said:
Tell me again .Why did we get rid of him?
Click to expand...
Totally agree that he's a talented coach and his man-management gets the best out his players.
Still looks on the other side of living. Just goes to show, looks can be deceiving.
To answer your question, though it smacks of sarcasm, I'm not sure. I was under the impression that he decided to leave. Either way, we could do with someone of his ilk, commitment, loyalty and integrity.
Hear that Moleman?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: WalsallHoop
Trammers said:
0 wins in a dozen or so games and openly derided during Cup defeat to MK Don's didn't help, nor did the fact that he was responsible for bringing in Barton, SWP, Luke Bloody Young, Gabidon, Ferdinand Anton all of whom made us worse than the team that won the championship..... plus sent Clint out on loan, sold Gorkass and Connolly......
I know he was hamstrung by tango and cash but he fecked up big time.....
Click to expand...
Wow. I must have been in limbo or a long holiday when this happened. Thanks for getting me up to date there Trammers.
There I was thinking he was a "saint", but in truth, he's looking more like a "sinner". But to be fair "Tango and Cash" would have made Citeh into a basketcase.
Too bad QPR board can't make a few more terminations a bit higher up this time.
Let's just see what happens in the first 5-10 weeks in the new season, shall we.
 
It wasn't Tango & Cash that got rid of him. They and him did the job they said they would and got us promoted to the premier League, despite of what one thought of them. Tony and his crew of astute football business men decided he wasn't good enough to manage in the premier League and chose that wonderful manager Sparky to take the reigns. The rest is history and look at the state of the club now!
 
  • Like
Reactions: YorkshireHoopster, Uber_Hoop, kiwiqpr and 1 other person
bobmid said:
It wasn't Tango & Cash that got rid of him. They and him did the job they said they would and got us promoted to the premier League, despite of what one thought of them. Tony and his crew of astute football business men decided he wasn't good enough to manage in the premier League and chose that wonderful manager Sparky to take the reins. The rest is history and look at the state of the club now!
Click to expand...
All the evidence says Colin isn’t good enough to manage in the PL.

Anyway, as you say, history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back