You wanted a 3 year loan? Or did you mean it should be a permanent?One year deal seems strange for Aaron. Guess the club still have some doubts over him
You wanted a 3 year loan? Or did you mean it should be a permanent?One year deal seems strange for Aaron. Guess the club still have some doubts over him
My socks have just asked if this is real?You must log in or register to see media
You wanted a 3 year loan? Or did you mean it should be a permanent?
One year deal seems strange for Aaron. Guess the club still have some doubts over him
Aah, missed that. I had wondered. Yeah, that is really wierd. Wonder who dictated it. Presumably the club.It is a permanent. That’s why the one-year deal is so weird.
Aah, missed that. I had wondered. Yeah, that is really wierd. Wonder who dictated it. Presumably the club.
This would be far more likely and sensible.Maybe HT2 will confirm if right as i was under the impression he was o0ffered a 2 year deal and club had option of further year.
Sorry I just can’t understand the reasoning behind paying a transfer fee for a player and only giving them a one-year contract. If he does very well and scores a decent amount of goals, he’ll have more suitors in the summer and he might not renew his contract and go for free somewhere else next summer. If he flops, we can’t even recoup some of the money we spent on him. It’s a lose-lose situation financially.
I'm missing an atricle mentioning fee and 1 year, but playing catchup after work. Was it Baz?Sorry I just can’t understand the reasoning behind paying a transfer fee for a player and only giving them a one-year contract. If he does very well and scores a decent amount of goals, he’ll have more suitors in the summer and he might not renew his contract and go for free somewhere else next summer. If he flops, we can’t even recoup some of the money we spent on him. It’s a lose-lose situation financially.
Sorry I just can’t understand the reasoning behind paying a transfer fee for a player and only giving them a one-year contract. If he does very well and scores a decent amount of goals, he’ll have more suitors in the summer and he might not renew his contract and go for free somewhere else next summer. If he flops, we can’t even recoup some of the money we spent on him. It’s a lose-lose situation financially.
I'm missing an atricle mentioning fee and 1 year, but playing catchup after work. Was it Baz?
You must log in or register to see media
Surely not. We wouldn’t pay £1.2m for 12 months
You must log in or register to see media
Surely not. We wouldn’t pay £1.2m for 12 months
I think you twist everything into a lose-lose. The first part is right, but if he doesn't perform then we're not getting a fee for reselling him, and so having him out of contract would be a good thing for us. That's presumably the reason for the contract. It may turn out to be a lose if he does well but no it's not a lose-lose.
Prefer him to play between both boxes than tick themTwine could potentially tick both boxes.
Likely a clause if he plays a number of games for an automatic extensionOh do **** off. If Ehab was still running things, people would be tearing their hair out and raging over this transfer. Paying a transfer fee for a 23-year-old and only giving him a one-year contract with no option is just money pissed down the drain. If he scores 15-20 goals and others are interested, he goes next summer for nowt. If he doesn’t do well, he goes next summer for nowt.