The point of an outswinging corner is that it allows the attackers to attack the ball while facing the goal, and forces defenders to face their own goal too, which they never want to do. Not saying it's always effective, but that's the appeal of it.
The point of an outswinging corner is that it allows the attackers to attack the ball while facing the goal, and forces defenders to face their own goal too, which they never want to do. Not saying it's always effective, but that's the appeal of it.
If Connelly is in the building and Tetteh's gone then we aint playing crosses into the box in the conventional sense of the word, big guy knocks it down. More like hoping for cut backs to Delap, Connelly and Oscar from the likes of Vaughan and Traore, plus tippy-tappy stuff on the edge of the box.
PS...Our corners have been rubbish for a long time.
It's kicking a ball, not under pressure, how hard can it be for a professional footballer?
Goal kicks even worseThrow ins not much better
I wouldn't say its not under pressure.
Anyone can beat the first man with a floaty ball that either gets caught or headed out.
Doing it with whip, pace and a dangerous trajectory which also gives your oncoming players a chance whilst putting it on a sixpence is the tricky bit.
If it was easy everyone would beat the first man.
That's why we play out from the back now...Goal kicks even worse
Thats Tigresses specialist subject...Throw ins not much better
Agree. And that's what I don't get at all. Time & again we get a throw in well into the oppositions half yet the ball ends up going straightback to the full back then to the CB's or keeper. I get that the logic is ball retention and recycling (yep, I know!) but surely we should work on attacking plays from such positions?This. I agree the corners aren't easy to get perfect. Our throw ins are far more concerning. We either lose the ball or they quickly end up back with Ingram most of the time. Funnily enough just like that corner did on Saturday as well.
Agree. And that's what I don't get at all. Time & again we get a throw in well into the oppositions half yet the ball ends up going straightback to the full back then to the CB's or keeper. I get that the logic is ball retention and recycling (yep, I know!) but surely we should work on attacking plays from such positions?
True. Oddly enough the multiple ball system perhaps doesn't complement us...that well. No time to think what to do. On Saturday Vinegar Joe had few options in the opposition half and had to hold on for ages. Ball was soon shunted back into our own half and promptly ended up at the feet of Ingram.. Time & again we get a throw in well into the oppositions half yet the ball ends up going straight back to the full back then to the CB's or keeper.
Agree. And that's what I don't get at all. Time & again we get a throw in well into the oppositions half yet the ball ends up going straightback to the full back then to the CB's or keeper. I get that the logic is ball retention and recycling (yep, I know!) but surely we should work on attacking plays from such positions?
Agree. I can't see the logic in gaining a foothold deep in the opponent's half only to surrender it and then potentially lose possession anyway in the next move.
If Connelly is in the building and Tetteh's gone then we aint playing crosses into the box in the conventional sense of the word, big guy knocks it down. More like hoping for cut backs to Delap, Connelly and Oscar from the likes of Vaughan and Traore, plus tippy-tappy stuff on the edge of the box.
PS...Our corners have been rubbish for a long time.