Transfer Rumours Summer '23 Transfer Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Well what I’ve learnt so far on this thread is:-
Oscars defo going
Connelly and Tetteh will definitely be injured all next season
Delap is overrated and will be rubbish
Harry will go on loan to Brid Town or is it Trinity
Vinagre is totally f****d so is signing
Darlow loved it here that much he’s going to Boro - not for the money
Tufan’s bought a house in Swanland so he’s going back to Turkey
Greaves is defo going for peanuts
City should make admission free to all
but what I wish is that I had all your crystal balls or access to the firm info you all have access to .
Opinions are fine negative guesses or assumptions are really worthless .
Anyway how do you all ‘know’ this stuff, club’s a sieve of confidential information
Mind you it’s entertaining LOL

The only defo is no one is going to Brid Trinity. They went out of business when Ken Richardson owned Brid Town and acted like a non league Dr Allam.
 
  • Like
Reactions: springtiger
Who else is going to pay him £8-10k a week? He failed at Boro, failed at Venezia and got crocked with us

Considering we'll have paid similar to get Vale for half a season and Baxter for a full season, I don't think it's a bad punt.

At the end of the day, they're loans so who cares if they play. It gives us loads of options upfront and all the out-and-out strikers are a little different.

So why don't Brighton pay out his contract and we sign him? That's my point. There's no benefit to Brighton doing things this way, they aren't going to get a fee for him.
 
I don't begrudge selling Oscar for 8 figures. Taking a punt on someone and making a tidy profit is exactly how clubs like us stay afloat. Hopefully in the process some of those punts help us gain promotion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mckechnie Orange
So why don't Brighton pay out his contract and we sign him? That's my point. There's no benefit to Brighton doing things this way, they aren't going to get a fee for him.

They've got an option year so they could definitely get a fee for him if he has a decent season
 
They've got an option year so they could definitely get a fee for him if he has a decent season

Everyone (read: Brighton fans) I've asked says this is it, but if there's an option year then fair enough, that's the missing piece I wasn't understanding in the deal.
 
So why don't Brighton pay out his contract and we sign him? That's my point. There's no benefit to Brighton doing things this way, they aren't going to get a fee for him.

I would expect there would be extra costs and it wouldn’t just be a case of making up the difference. Loaning him is probably cheaper up front, don’t know if there’s any tax benefit/implications of one way vs the other either?

It also gives them the option of extending his contract, regardless of having an extra year, if he’s scored 20 goals by January.

It’s not a rare thing for players in their final year of contract to be loaned.
 
I would expect there would be extra costs and it wouldn’t just be a case of making up the difference. Loaning him is probably cheaper up front, don’t know if there’s any tax benefit/implications of one way vs the other either?

Think the answer is the year option, nothing more complicated than that.
 
Loads of players go out on loan in their final year, can hardly think of many times they’ve been released instead.

Can you name a couple? I can't think of many, if any, unless it's with a view to a permanent with the club signing them (like Boyd for us).