Transfer Rumours Summer 2024 transfer thread

[TigerMarv]

I'm by no means a football analyst, but I wouldn't be disappointed to see Omur benched. He has a lot of energy, and always looks busy, but he really struggles with end product, in terms of either goals or assists.

Taking the pressure of him, and making use of him as an impact sub until he gains some sort of form, probably isn't a bad thing.

This makes sense but I'd rather give him a run playing as 10, he's completely wasted on the wing

 

[1MoreAgain]

Because players come and go, the goal is to get City into the Premiership, you achieve this by having better players

That's the reason they buying the players they already have what is the point in buying them then not playing them waste of time and money for player and club.

 

[Gone For A Walk]

this is great, who is this chap?

Kurt Johansson

 

[AlRawdah]

You must log in or register to see media

He’s like Allsop in distribution (actually better) and Pandur in shot stopping so I kind of get it tbh

If he is better than what we have, get him in and get him in the starting XI. Pandur and Racioppi will both understand and respect that, it's how their chosen industry works.

 

[Mckechnie Orange]

What?

Code for a cheap punt.

 

[bradymk2]

So rushworth is a decleration that we are aiming for 6th place minimum

 

[Chazz Rheinhold]

So rushworth is a decleration that we are aiming for 6th place minimum

6th-8th
If another keeper comes up that may get us 4th-6th in the next few days we’ll get him in
Why wouldn’t you?

 

[Howdentiger2]

Rushworth is a fantastic keeper and if he was brought in at the start of the window as the competition to pandur then I'd be really pleased and excited for him being here,but bringing him in now is a waste of both money and a loan spot. If it was a permanent move then I could almost get the "to good to pass up" lines. But it would definitely mean one of the others would have to go imo. But from what we know so far.... I'm just not sure why we're doing it

 

[bradymk2]

Rushworth is a fantastic keeper and if he was brought in at the start of the window as the competition to pandur then I'd be really pleased and excited for him being here,but bringing him in now is a waste of both money and a loan spot. If it was a permanent move then I could almost get the "to good to pass up" lines. But it would definitely mean one of the others would have to go imo. But from what we know so far.... I'm just not sure why we're doing it

Thats why it must be a playoff place decleration

Hes on loan, meaning our own keepers progress gets halted
He played in the champ last season
So anything below 6th is a massive failure

Otherwise wed let our keepers get more experience
Get better at passing and the system etc

 

[JoelTheTiger]

Hull Live now back up to six additions in their latest report - Rushworth, Cooper, two wingers, a midfielder and a striker.

 

[ElliotC]

Hull Live now back up to six additions in their latest report - Rushworth, Cooper, two wingers, a midfielder and a striker.

Do we need another midfielder?

 

[bradymk2]

6th-8th
If another keeper comes up that may get us 4th-6th in the next few days we’ll get him in
Why wouldn’t you?

Its why we got cooper
Too much experience and good to pass up
Mr hughes can sit on the bench and learn

 

[Baldrick's Cunning Plan]

What is Sinik's injury record?

He had a reported hamstring injury early on with us, but since then it's been much more vague. He's been with us for 2 years, made 2 starts with a handful of substitute appearances, been out on loan twice with a similar picture of appearances.

We never hear any clear recovery news about him, just vague teasers like he's back on the grass.

There's no clarity at all and no one ever seems to actually explain what's going on.

When I hear that name it just winds me up. How many players in this league with that sort of injury track record would be allowed to stay at a club for this long. Does this mean all long term injured players at the club will be pampered as much? We all know the answer to that. It goes beyond goodwill. Isn't he the owner's mate?

 

[Ajbtiger]

Do we need another midfielder?

Not necessarily but we do need this midfielder.

 

[NewcastleTiger]

Do we need another midfielder?

I think Meffert is needed yeah. Heavily experienced in his career and Walter’s system

 

[ElliotC]

Forgot about Meffert. My bad.

 

[Summerof69]

Rushworth is a fantastic keeper and if he was brought in at the start of the window as the competition to pandur then I'd be really pleased and excited for him being here,but bringing him in now is a waste of both money and a loan spot. If it was a permanent move then I could almost get the "to good to pass up" lines. But it would definitely mean one of the others would have to go imo. But from what we know so far.... I'm just not sure why we're doing it

The only thing that makes any sense to me is that Walter is saying that the two we have are not ready yet to play the role that is required for his system to be successful.

 

[Tony Angelino]

and if we get promoted the 2 we’ve recently signed won’t be good enough for the pl.
A: because they weren’t good enough for the championship
B: they haven’t played first team for nearly a year.

so a waste of a fees, a waste of wages, a waste of time.

signing another keeper makes no sense

 

[Tony Angelino]

The only thing that makes any sense to me is that Walter is saying that the two we have are not ready yet to play the role that is required for his system to be successful.

But it doesn’t make sense because he signed one of them keepers off

 

[ElliotC]

But it doesn’t make sense because he signed one of them keepers off

...and plays the other