Although pandur has been here all pre season and to be honest hasn’t done anything wrong....and plays the other
Although pandur has been here all pre season and to be honest hasn’t done anything wrong....and plays the other
I suspect that Walter has highlighted that the keeper and DM are the most important roles in his system and that he agreed to Raccioppi (sp) as a back up to Pandur but now feels that neither of them is comfortable enough with the ball at feet to get the best out of the system.But it doesn’t make sense because he signed one of them keepers off
and if we get promoted the 2 we’ve recently signed won’t be good enough for the pl.
A: because they weren’t good enough for the championship
B: they haven’t played first team for nearly a year.
so a waste of a fees, a waste of wages, a waste of time.
signing another keeper makes no sense
and if we get promoted the 2 we’ve recently signed won’t be good enough for the pl.
A: because they weren’t good enough for the championship
B: they haven’t played first team for nearly a year.
so a waste of a fees, a waste of wages, a waste of time.
signing another keeper makes no sense
The only thing that makes any sense to me is that Walter is saying that the two we have are not ready yet to play the role that is required for his system to be successful.
You’d imagine it would be Racioppi after the start, that just makes us look very amateur if we do that though.If that’s the case and we sign another keeper then one of Pandur or Racioppi needs to go out on loan.
So our squad will look like this (non bold players will probably be loaned out):
Goalkeepers:
Pandur
Raccioppi
Rushworth
TLT
Cartwright
LB:
Giles
Jacob
New guy
RB:
L. Coyle
Drameh
CB:
Jones
McLoughlin
Burns
Hughes
Cooper
Smith
Ashbee
Leake
CM:
Zambrano
Meffert
Puerta
Slater
Simons
New Guy
R. Coyle
Tinsdale
LW:
Millar
Sinik
RW:
Longman
Jarvis
New Guy
AM:
Omur
Mehlem
Vaughan
ST:
Bedia
Burstow
New Guy
Sellars-Fleming
Hall
That gives us 28, assuming there are no outgoings from the bold selections and that the ones not in bold don't end up going out on loan or leaving. I don't think that's overly bloated and gives plenty of competition for places.
You'll get little sympathy here either, now hop it.Only time will tell, only time will tell !!!!
Nothing more to ad, except maybe that
I dropped a crowbar on my right foot yesterday
while taking the old beds apart to take to tip
Two months ago I broke the big toe
on my left foot, in the Norm’s world of possible
positivity I could of ****ed them both up together
instead of just hobbling on one foot, then two months later, the other foot, see every cloud and all that…. Mind you get absolutely no
sympathy in this bloody house… just the butt of everyone’s jokes…for two months ..lol
A new LB?
Yeah one of the new signings is supposed to be a left back. If we only had Giles and Jacob I'd be concerned. Jacob hasn't settled into this new system and they want to get him out on loan for league experience, which would just leave Giles and an out of position Lewie Coyle.
Yeah one of the new signings is supposed to be a left back. If we only had Giles and Jacob I'd be concerned. Jacob hasn't settled into this new system and they want to get him out on loan for league experience, which would just leave Giles and an out of position Lewie Coyle.
Woods was a lemon, prob the lemon of all lemons above Sinik.....Oscar, we've prob taken a bit of a hit on him, though his first season you could put a case forwards to say that without his goals we may have gone down, so we at least got some ROI in that first year.Or we've taken losses on players to get rid of them like Woods and Oscar. Oscar's signing on fee and wages would have been substantially more than the ~1m we got for him.
Where have you seen that? Thought it was just GK, CM, two wingers, and striker?
Just what I was told buddy.
You know if its Loan or Permanent?
Loan I believe.