Here comes 20 pages on why this isn't a good idea
Well, 20 pages of some saying it's a bad idea and some saying it makes perfect sense.
Here comes 20 pages on why this isn't a good idea
So a 6th loan? Very odd.
I wonder how many more pages there will be after that happens.Ill be glad when the window shuts in two days
We should go for 1k minimum.I wonder how many more pages there will be after that happens.
I do think he has a role to play against teams sitting deep. He’s probably the best passer of the defendersBurns for me is the casualty in all of this.
Any particular foot lolYou'll get little sympathy here either, now hop it.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
Too ****ing right it was.Sssshhhhhh
You're not allowed to say that, it was all Roseniors fault
Too ****ing right it was.
Or switching sport.Because players come and go, the goal is to get City into the Premiership, you achieve this by having better players
If it gets us promoted it makes sense.and if we get promoted the 2 we’ve recently signed won’t be good enough for the pl.
A: because they weren’t good enough for the championship
B: they haven’t played first team for nearly a year.
so a waste of a fees, a waste of wages, a waste of time.
signing another keeper makes no sense
Reply to every single post even his own?
Poor Orange. He is Mr Angry.Reply to every single post even his own?
What if the mods can do it so his edited posts count twice? That should help
No one is denying it’s not a good signing. But it just doesn’t bode well when you sign someone of the pedigree of Racioppi and now he’s already been replacedThe good old days of the Allams…
Spend the absolute minimum on transfers and wages. Run the club like a business. Sell any player with potential to the highest bidder. Any place above the relegation places deemed as a success.
Hey… but at least it was a clear ****ing plan eh Chazz?