Transfer Rumours Summer 2024 transfer thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
80% isn't a worrying number, the lists of potential players clubs have are absolutely huge, they will only ever actually sign 5/7% of them

Not sure the list is as big as you think. Yes there'll be a database of players that's huge, but we won't (or shouldn't) put any to Tim that haven't been already vetted and along the lines of what he wants. They'll also have to be obtainable otherwise what's the point in offering then.

So once the list has been whittled down from that then to still not even get the ball rolling on 80% when we need about 10 players minimum is a bit concerning imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
80% isn't a worrying number, the lists of potential players clubs have are absolutely huge, they will only ever actually sign 5/7% of them

I suppose it depends on how much time and resource is going into the rejected 80%, if it’s just a name on a list then that’s fine. But if they’re having conversations with a player/agent only for it to be rejected by the coach later down the line then that seems like a terribly inefficient way of going about business.
 
80% isn't a worrying number, the lists of potential players clubs have are absolutely huge, they will only ever actually sign 5/7% of them
Years ago Hartlepool's manager stated that they had a list of around sixty possible transfer targets, they moved down the list as targets were missed/hit. :emoticon-0125-mmm:


The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim the Tiger
Not sure the list is as big as you think. Yes there'll be a database of players that's huge, but we won't (or shouldn't) put any to Tim that haven't been already vetted and along the lines of what he wants. They'll also have to be obtainable otherwise what's the point in offering then.

So once the list has been whittled down from that then to still not even get the ball rolling on 80% when we need about 10 players minimum is a bit concerning imo.

Agree. It suggests we'd need to present (roughly) 500 players to Tim to get to the ten we need. Of course he's probably not literally turning down 80% but to suggest it's no big deal is rather disingenuous.
 
TBF I think the fact he's rejected players is a good thing and not sure it can be seen as anything but that, he knows what he wants and won't settle for less. That's what we want in a gaffer

No one is suggesting he should happily accept every player presented to him.
 
TBF I think the fact he's rejected players is a good thing and not sure it can be seen as anything but that, he knows what he wants and won't settle for less. That's what we want in a gaffer

Oh absolutely its a good thing Tim knows what he wants and who would fit in, i think it's more the other side not doing their job as well as they could.

Imagine you told me what kind of player you wanted, profile, position, style etc. And then when i come back with say, a 10 man shortlist from the 50 originals that ive whittled down to what i think you want... You dont like 8 of them.

Just think our scouts/recruitment team should have a better hit rate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
Oh absolutely its a good thing Tim knows what he wants and who would fit in, i think it's more the other side not doing their job as well as they could.

Imagine you told me what kind of player you wanted, profile, position, style etc. And then when i come back with say, a 10 man shortlist from the 50 originals that ive whittled down to what i think you want... You dont like 8 of them.

Just think our scouts/recruitment team should have a better hit rate.

Tbf from my time working as a scout that's pretty standard, a recruitment/scouting teams job is to present options, the longer a team & manager has worked together the easier it gets. But I honestly wouldn't be worried about the numbers we've seen today.
 
Tell that to T Geraghty, (no, not that one) and the government censor of the time. :emoticon-0125-mmm:


The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.

Yes, but of course that was to confuse the enemy as the place Hull is not is on the coast.
 
Last edited:
Oh absolutely its a good thing Tim knows what he wants and who would fit in, i think it's more the other side not doing their job as well as they could.

Imagine you told me what kind of player you wanted, profile, position, style etc. And then when i come back with say, a 10 man shortlist from the 50 originals that ive whittled down to what i think you want... You dont like 8 of them.

Just think our scouts/recruitment team should have a better hit rate.
You’ve got to think though, the 10 targets also have different availabilities, take up different size chunks of the budget. If they took him bud perfect ideal right back as a target, but it means he can’t sign another winger, he’d turn it down as we have Coyle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howdentiger2