Transfer Rumours Summer 2024 transfer thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
In acun’s interview he refers to Oscar as a good signing, yet he’s been away as long as he’s been here. His first loan club let him go and now he’s mostly warming a bench in brazil. We’ve got no striker and there’s no real talk of him coming back….good signing ?
 
If I didn't know better I'd say this is a scorched earth policy before the owner completes his retreat to Turkey. He thinks the odds are stacked against him making an instant impact with FFP and he's probably right. He's obviously clearing the decks, hopefully he'll have learnt from his mistakes and will recruit a winning team. I believe he can achieve everyone's dream and he should be given the support and time he deserves from the fans. I wouldn't be surprised to see a new player coming from one of the smaller Euro 2024 teams to calm things down a little.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
If I didn't know better I'd say this is a scorched earth policy before the owner completes his retreat to Turkey. He thinks the odds are stacked against him making an instant impact with FFP and he's probably right. He's obviously clearing the decks, hopefully he'll have learnt from his mistakes and will recruit a winning team. I believe he can achieve everyone's dream and he should be given the support and time he deserves from the fans. I wouldn't be surprised to see a new player coming from one of the smaller Euro 2024 teams to calm things down a little.
Not Scotland ffs
Things aren’t that bad surely?
 
What I really don’t like about this ‘if the player wants to leave, we will let them leave’ thing Acun constantly repeats is that it sends a message to our players and any potential players that contracts don’t actually matter if you just tell the chairman nicely you want to go and we’ll accept a bid below our estimation than if the player didn’t say he wanted to go.

Do you think Daniel Levy just rolled over and accepted lower bids for Harry Kane simply because Kane wanted to move elsewhere? Kane actually tried to push a move a few years ago and Levy said ‘he’s going ****ing nowhere until you meet our valuation’.

Acun needs to realise he’s chairman of a football club, not chairman of the PFA, and the interests of the club should be more important than the whims and wishes of players under contract. Whilst it’s great personally for Tufan, Greaves, Philogene and **** knows who else that they got their ideal moves this summer, where does that leave us? We’re in the **** right now as we have so few players and have to scramble a squad together and bed them in before our first game of the season.
 
If I didn't know better I'd say this is a scorched earth policy before the owner completes his retreat to Turkey. He thinks the odds are stacked against him making an instant impact with FFP and he's probably right. He's obviously clearing the decks, hopefully he'll have learnt from his mistakes and will recruit a winning team. I believe he can achieve everyone's dream and he should be given the support and time he deserves from the fans. I wouldn't be surprised to see a new player coming from one of the smaller Euro 2024 teams to calm things down a little.

Mmmmm,small Euro 2024 teams???

Are Southampton flogging us Che Adams:emoticon-0103-cool:
 
Think of all of this in the way you manage your shopping. Empty your fridge and cupboards and then go and buy some more. You know you’ll have something ready for tea

Good analogy but we need to replace the steak, the chips, the peas, the mushrooms, the bearnaise sauce, the salt, the pepper and some ****er has put in a bid for the ****ing frying pan. Oh and it tea time in 10 minutes and the new chef only cooks curry in hurry.
 
What I really don’t like about this ‘if the player wants to leave, we will let them leave’ thing Acun constantly repeats is that it sends a message to our players and any potential players that contracts don’t actually matter if you just tell the chairman nicely you want to go and we’ll accept a bid below our estimation than if the player didn’t say he wanted to go.

Do you think Daniel Levy just rolled over and accepted lower bids for Harry Kane simply because Kane wanted to move elsewhere? Kane actually tried to push a move a few years ago and Levy said ‘he’s going ****ing nowhere until you meet our valuation’.

Acun needs to realise he’s chairman of a football club, not chairman of the PFA, and the interests of the club should be more important than the whims and wishes of players under contract. Whilst it’s great personally for Tufan, Greaves, Philogene and **** knows who else that they got their ideal moves this summer, where does that leave us? We’re in the **** right now as we have so few players and have to scramble a squad together and bed them in before our first game of the season.
I tend to agree with most of this
 
What I really don’t like about this ‘if the player wants to leave, we will let them leave’ thing Acun constantly repeats is that it sends a message to our players and any potential players that contracts don’t actually matter if you just tell the chairman nicely you want to go and we’ll accept a bid below our estimation than if the player didn’t say he wanted to go.

Do you think Daniel Levy just rolled over and accepted lower bids for Harry Kane simply because Kane wanted to move elsewhere? Kane actually tried to push a move a few years ago and Levy said ‘he’s going ****ing nowhere until you meet our valuation’.

Acun needs to realise he’s chairman of a football club, not chairman of the PFA, and the interests of the club should be more important than the whims and wishes of players under contract. Whilst it’s great personally for Tufan, Greaves, Philogene and **** knows who else that they got their ideal moves this summer, where does that leave us? We’re in the **** right now as we have so few players and have to scramble a squad together and bed them in before our first game of the season.
On the other hand, its probably a good message for potential new signings to hear though, along with loan clubs and agents etc. They will be happier moving to us, knowing that the club won't stand in their way if a bigger club comes in. Player gets the move he deserves, agent gets pockets lined, loan clubs get a more valuable asset at a club where the chairman appears to care for the players etc. It also may help us get deals like Abdus over the line, where the selling club get a hefty sell on in return for a low transfer fee.

I'm not being difficult, I am just trying to show the other side of his tactic.

It looks like we're also getting north of £40m plus sell ons for Greaves and Jaden which is not exactly way below market value even though he's saying they can leave.

I do find the Giles transfer utterly bizarre though, especially when we aren't making a profit.
 
Last edited:
Good analogy but we need to replace the steak, the chips, the peas, the mushrooms, the bearnaise sauce, the salt, the pepper and some ****er has put in a bid for the ****ing frying pan. Oh and it tea time in 10 minutes and the new chef only cooks curry in hurry.

All the good scran is gone and all that’s left is Pot Noodles and Rich Tea biscuits and some ****’s gonna take them soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stockholm Tiger
What I really don’t like about this ‘if the player wants to leave, we will let them leave’ thing Acun constantly repeats is that it sends a message to our players and any potential players that contracts don’t actually matter if you just tell the chairman nicely you want to go and we’ll accept a bid below our estimation than if the player didn’t say he wanted to go.

Do you think Daniel Levy just rolled over and accepted lower bids for Harry Kane simply because Kane wanted to move elsewhere? Kane actually tried to push a move a few years ago and Levy said ‘he’s going ****ing nowhere until you meet our valuation’.

Acun needs to realise he’s chairman of a football club, not chairman of the PFA, and the interests of the club should be more important than the whims and wishes of players under contract. Whilst it’s great personally for Tufan, Greaves, Philogene and **** knows who else that they got their ideal moves this summer, where does that leave us? We’re in the **** right now as we have so few players and have to scramble a squad together and bed them in before our first game of the season.
£40m combined isn’t rolling over I don’t think…
 
How do you know? Has it been released how much? Missed it..

If Boro were willing to pay what we paid, then Luton would have accepted that rather than impose the obligation as it would have made no difference to them. If they were willing to pay more, then it would have been to their advantage to do that.
 
On the other hand, its probably a good message for potential new signings to hear though, along with loan clubs and agents etc. They will be happier moving to us, knowing that the club won't stand in their way if a bigger club comes in. Player gets the move he deserves, agent gets pockets lined, loan clubs get a more valuable asset at a club where the chairman appears to care for the players etc. It also may help us get deals like Abdus over the line, where the selling club get a hefty sell on in return for a low transfer fee.

I'm not being difficult, I am just trying to show the other side of his tactic.

It looks like we're also getting north of £40m plus sell ons for Greaves and Jaden which is not exactly way below market value even though he's saying they can leave.

I do find the Giles transfer utterly bizarre though, especially when we aren't making a profit.
What if we were committed to the Giles transfer regardless , but then were happy to move him on at no profit because we didn’t want him ? God knows on here the nay sayers were about 60/40 about him not performing .
 
If Boro were willing to pay what we paid, then Luton would have accepted that rather than impose the obligation as it would have made no difference to them. If they were willing to pay more, then it would have been to their advantage to do that.
But surely if we had an obligation to buy at a price..even if they offered 10 mill to Luton he would still have come here for 4 mill. Is that how it works? I'm really guessing what looks like.