Yeah because you always hear what footballers are saying, even when they decide to whisper obscenities to each other. Its not like the crowd can possibly drown out a sly underhand racial slur now is it.
As for the cameras, you cant even bloody tell half the time whether a foul was commited or a goal crossed the line with replays. How your so confident an off the ball incident in a crowded box will be conclusively proven/disproven depending on whether accurate footage exists is silly.
For me, I have no doubts Suarez did racially abuse Evra . The guy is nasty piece of work (Re: Biting) and an all round dick (Epitomized for me by the patronizing hand on Evras head) and I suspect the cameras will show enough for everyone (not a liverpool supporter at least) to know he's guilty but not be 100% cast iron, airtight, conclusive and he'll weasel outta punishment.
SO what you've said is it's almost impossible to prove it, what with video evidence often being inconclusive when it comes to fouls etc., and mics being unable to pick up discrete sounds and words because of the crowd noise.
But, despite this argument, which I agree with, you then go on to say you have 'no doubts' based on previous, unrelated offences, which is bollocks.
It seems that no matter what happens in this case, you'll remain convinced he is guilty. Thank god you're not in law.
