Steve Bruce
- Thread starter Chazz Rheinhold
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
It's pathetic that you can't bear to see him criticised. He behaves like a **** and makes it his mission to piss everyone off. If that wasn't the case no one would have a problem. As it is they've ruined the enjoyment of my football club. That might be fine to you as long as you get to see Rooney in real life but it isn't to me.
Small time attitude?
Get to ****.
What got us relegated was players not playing to their ability.
Rather than being a snarky twat, care to state exactly who you mean is supporting closing stands? Names please.
Your obsession really is eating you up. You're really not a good face of HCST. You're too narrow minded and full of anger. You should start your own protest group where you can be angry all the time.
I wouldn't start asking him to name names about people supporting closing stands. It tends to get those people upset
Myself and others have said several times that you need to pick your cause, and not just rant at every opportunity. You've become the boy that cried wolf at a time when there is a battle to be fought.
The closure of the upper west and subsequent evictions has taken too much of a back seat in my view.
The point about waiting until after the Euros is a good one. I'd love Martin O'Neill if we could get him, and he's experienced in succeeding Bruce in jobs! 
"They" haven't ruined your enjoyment - that choice is yours & yours alone. As for me, I'm indifferent as regards the Allams. They are the owners & they've done some very good things I'm happy about and some very bad things that I'm not. However, they are not the worst owners the club has had in my lifetime & they're certainly not the best. Nothing they've done or said has made any difference to my desire to go and support the team at every opportunity. That's where we differ.
You can't bear it to be true but that doesn't change it. You don't get to decide who's done the ruining. I've stopped going because the enjoyment was ruined by the Allams. They infected the weak types like yourself and created the situation with booing each other and all that crap. Even now immediately after promotion all the discussion is about them and whether our club will finally be free of their rule or if they'll carry on clinging to power and desperately trying to convince us that it's us that needs them.
Immediately after Wembley your first thought was to start a thread thanking the glorious ruler for it all. Almost as if you were fishing for someone to respond so you could say they were obsessed.
When Steve Harper was quizzed about why we got relegated, he said it was because of an inability to score goals. When asked why we struggled to score goals, he pinned it down to 3 things:
The 5-4-1 not giving us enough options in attack leaving a striker without support.
An absolute bare minimal amount of practicing attacking in training.
Something else which I've forgotten.
The point is your assesment of it being down to the players is absolutely spot on. It's down to them that they weren't suited to play the roles they chose with a ridiculous formation, and they should have been doing at least 10 hours unpaid over time each weak practicing attacking together.
The third is the managers fault imo.
So the managers not entirely faultless but the two biggest **** ups were at the hands of the players. Enough to shut up the fickle bruce out brigade anyway.
I wouldn't start asking him to name names about people supporting moving the away fans to the West Upper. It tends to get those people upset.
I that 'little old Hull' bollocks, if Leicester thought they were 'little old Leicester' they wouldn't have won the league.
Ive missed this argument cos I dont go to home games - but what's happening and what's the general feeling? Is there a proposal to put away fans in a section of west upper? Not knowing how other people feel I might be on a limb here but I think it's the best place for them. We should have the whole lower bowl supporting City. It looks better on TV and the further away from the pitch that we can get the opposition fans the better.
Until this season, Leicester had won 8 division titles, 4 times FA cup runners up, once 1st division runners up, won the community shield and won 3 cups. All in front of crowds of 30k plus.
I'm not quite sure how you'd describe them as 'Little old Leicester'.
They're not, I'm talking about the attitude, not the size of the club.
Bournemouth are ****ing tiny, but they didn't show anyone too much respect, they just had a go at winning every game, exactly as it should be.
There's a Safety Advisory Group meeting at the start of July, at which the moving of the away fans to the West Upper will be discussed. I'll start a thread a bit nearer the time to gauge what people's thoughts are on the idea.
Nah. I was one of those that offered that as an option for thought when the eviction from the east, that some less enlightened and experienced types wholeheartedly supported, was forced on us, and look at the cluster **** their ignorance and arrogance has helped create.
I don't know anyone that got upset at the suggestion and the considerations would have always included the clear need to listen to those affected.
The plight if those poor sods in upper west seems to be being played down this time too.
You'd think some would learn from the clear and obvious mistakes of the past instead of trying to deny or rewrite the uncomfortable bits.