SMC groundsmen gone

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
David Burns‏@bbcburnsy
Mark and Darrell will be on Friday's show to discuss their sacking.
Sad but of course entirely expected that people are leaping to honest Ehab's defence.
Sad but of course entirely expected that people are leaping to the defence of these two withou
As per usual the whole situation has been 'managed' appallingly.

It's almost as if it's done deliberately.

I'm sure Ehab doesn't read these forums but if he does I'd just like to share this with him.

You can appear in as many ****y , glossy magazines with your Wessie arsewipe mates, whom all think they're the elite, as much as you like.

You can treat people like **** and lord over others , ruining lives as if it's all a big game as much as you like.

You can drive around the West Hull villages at ridiculous speed in your chavved up Batmobile jeep type monstrosity as much as you like.


But I'll tell you something else as well; your hair is ****ing ridiculous.

You look like a receding Lionel Ritchie.

Man up and shave the bastard off, Chris Kamara wannabe motherfucker.

Either that or go and buy an Irish because you look like a proper tit end.


FACT.

I wonder why there is so little dialogue between the fans and the club ?
 
Sad but of course entirely expected that people are leaping to the defence of these two withou


I wonder why there is so little dialogue between the fans and the club ?


Because the club has never wanted one? Or more accurately, the present owners don't want dialogues with them or with anyone else for that matter.
It is my way or the highway.

I am sure everyone else on here will recall what Albert Camus wrote, " Tyrants conduct monologues above a million solitudes...".
 
I doubt the SMC are all that happy about getting this sort of press in a trade magazine...

http://www.thestadiumbusiness.com/2017/05/19/groundsmen-dig-dismissals-hull-stadium-operator/

An SMC spokesman told the Hull Daily Mail: “After seeking legal counsel the club have been advised not to comment on this matter due to its ongoing nature and potential for a further appeal.”


I wonder which club that is. Since Hull City assure us they're completely separate from the SMC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImperialTiger
An SMC spokesman told the Hull Daily Mail: “After seeking legal counsel the club have been advised not to comment on this matter due to its ongoing nature and potential for a further appeal.”

I wonder which club that is. Since Hull City assure us they're completely separate from the SMC.

They're always tripping up over that one, if you meet with the club to discuss an issue, it's pot luck who'll be representing which organisation.
 
Because the club has never wanted one? Or more accurately, the present owners don't want dialogues with them or with anyone else for that matter.
It is my way or the highway.

I am sure everyone else on here will recall what Albert Camus wrote, " Tyrants conduct monologues above a million solitudes...".

Absurd rebel.
 
Absurd rebel.


Underneath is my theme song. Alternated with Mr Wonderful.

Interesting story to this record and an example of the way singers and groups were buggered about and exploited by the likes of Phil Spector in those days. Hard to think it was 55 years ago I first heard this.

You must log in or register to see media
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash
Because the club has never wanted one? Or more accurately, the present owners don't want dialogues with them or with anyone else for that matter.
It is my way or the highway.

I am sure everyone else on here will recall what Albert Camus wrote, " Tyrants conduct monologues above a million solitudes...".

Yes.
 
So they haven't even gone to Acas!!

****ing laughable. Yet people are falling for it.
No one goes to ACAS when they've been sacked and want to claim against the employer
If you think you're right then why would you want pre claim conciliation? You'd want to take the employers to an ET and get your pound of public flesh
I've no idea about this case, but using ACAS for that is very rare, to non existent, in my experience
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evington
No one goes to ACAS when they've been sacked and want to claim against the employer
If you think you're right then why would you want pre claim conciliation? You'd want to take the employers to an ET and get your pound of public flesh
I've no idea about this case, but using ACAS for that is very rare, to non existent, in my experience
Sorry I thought you had to? First prior to a tribunal.
Mebbe my memory but I'm sure that's what I did. It was awhile ago though