How many ****ing clubs were they after
dont know, but i'm so glad they decided on ours
How many ****ing clubs were they after
Interesting bits I hadn't heard before (I probably missed them):
"Sunderland won't ever have to pay any money back."
"that will allow them to see how the club progresses, and how things pan out for the club with that money behind it."
'the trio... don't have any shares for their investment.'
'Newcastle United's need for a new training facility saw them walk away from that potential deal'
'With Chelsea and Watford they were put off by the need to build a new stadium'
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/spo...n-sunderland-investment-relationship-17219574
Agree re further involvement. Pretty bad that we can't afford maintenance of the stuff mentioned.And the speakers, I assumed that was laziness. About time like it's been annoying me for ages.
From the comment about Sunderland not having to pay anything back to FPP it's clear that they will be getting more involved in the future.
Thinking about it, Sunderland would never have to pay it back anyway because it would be Madrox that pays it back, but it suggests that they haven't even issued preference shares. So I still think it's a loan convertible to normal shares.What do you read into this? Does it strengthen the idea that the money will be converted into preference shares?
Utterly irrelevant and pointless comment re players and the lift. You don't think that it it is likely to be used by a broad spectrum of people including those that are less able?Young athletes shouldn't need to use a lift.
I think though that was methven dampening expectations on how money might be spent
He wont want rival clubs thinking we have multi million pound ' war chest'.
Seriously though I really believe we have a good enough squad. Maybe a freebie and a loan or 2 should be enough to get us over line.
PP's main job is ridding the squad of the negative stench left behind by ross.
It's well known that abramovic has had chelsea on the market a good while but by all accounts he wants over 1b for it. I think it includes a swanky hotel. Probably the numbers dont add up.How many ****ing clubs were they after
Sarcasm is wasted on some.Utterly irrelevant and pointless comment re players and the lift. You don't think that it it is likely to be used by a broad spectrum of people including those that are less able?
Go to bed you drunken foolSarcasm is wasted on some.
Maybe I should have used inverted commas to avert your righteous indignation
Shows what a great PR job Charlie did in selling the club to them.dont know, but i'm so glad they decided on ours
Doesn’t matter now mate they joined the best oneHow many ****ing clubs were they after

Poor lad, having to put up with a mere £40m striker and £17m winger.One of the things I posted, at the start of this, was that there would be a massive kick in the teeth for the Mags.
I was told it would be revealed 'in due course' so didn't disclose it ...
... to be fair lots guessed it in any case.
I was told NUFC would cost a new buyer £500 million with the payment to Ashley, the repairs to SJP, new training facilities, etc.
There's also the HMRC hanging over the club and the fact that the club don't own SJP.
The lad who told me all this basically said they're stuck with Ashley unless his circumstances change drastically.
Maybe you should try not being a pompous, self righteous arse for a change.Sarcasm is wasted on some.
Maybe I should have used inverted commas to avert your righteous indignation
Have a like for making me giggle like a school kid lolMaybe you should try not being a pompous, self righteous arse for a change.
It’s more the people who “give their time” to charity (bono for instance)! I’m not a rich man but my accountant has always said there are far more advantages in giving to charity than in spending on an item! I don’t know how it all works.
I do know that these people who “work fir nothing” (take Bono fir instance and the gig he “doesn’t get paid fir”) make millions in “non tax” from doing it! I also know that, at the top of every charity, there’s a very rich person in charge!
im all fir keeping money out of “the mans” picket... then again I work in the public sector so not paying them technically could mean not paying me!!!
And both are pappPoor lad, having to put up with a mere £40m striker and £17m winger.![]()
I think at the top of the big well known charity’s it is they are on ridiculous amounts of moneyWhat an utter load of bollocks, your statement that at the top of every charity is a very rich person.
I know for certain that is NOT true.
It tells me Charlie's gob works a lot faster than his brain.What do you read into this? Does it strengthen the idea that the money will be converted into preference shares?