Save Hull City

The AGM was held a few months back. There was an opportunity for all to speak.

The Trust publicised that Committee members were visible & available pre-match at the WG prior to home games.

 

Thanks for that

I forgot about Gemmel (mainly because I went in there anyway so they were just there!)

Quite a chunk of the things people suggested were actually done then

 

I didn't like them being available in William Gemmel...I drank in there with Askew anyway and the bar was busy enough without Happy always popping along to have a chat with them

 

I'm trying to keep out of it, but as you asked, I still feel that attitude and communication are two areas where the trust are lacking when it comes to fan involvement.

If they have taken up ideas offered on here, it would have been a positive step if they'd acknowledged it and thanked people, instead of trying to imply they dream these things alone.

They generally seem to look threatened and become defensive towards comments.

It's not a sudden claim, it's one I've made from the off, and I've seen little if anything to show it's the wrong view.

I mean it as a constructive comment, but it is rarely taken that way.

 

So the discussions on here were a waste of time, and nobody from the trust paid any attention, despite requests.

Each time you 'defend' the situation, you help make the points.

It's why I'm not that arsed in getting involved. I posted the links in response to someone claiming nobody offered suggestions. Clearly they did, but were ignored, even though the trust had a log in, which they said they'd use.

Most of what I'm liable to say will be on the links, and haven't changed from the get go, so to repeat them only reinforces the point, and others dig their heals in further the other way.

And all the time, the club goes to ratshit and everyone blames each other. People find other ways to fill in their Saturdays, as nobody is offering any prospect of change.

 

You're generally selective on which hat you're wearing. It doesn't help much. I thought I recalled Bielbs and PLT using that account, or at least saying they would but I could be wrong. It's academic as the option is there if there's a desire.

Links were posted showing a few of the many threads on here were things were discussed. You answered on it, confirming you thought none were actioned by the trust as a result of fans views.

The fact you highlight that the trust don't post on here and that the comments from fans seem to be being ignored, confirms my oft made point about communication and attitude.

 

It's groundhog day on here.

And all the time, the club turns to ratshit, and people find other things to do on a matchday.

 

I do think it would be good if the Trust used a 'formal' account on here
They could comment on suggestions, pass out Trust info etc whilst still choosing to remain silent on some issues if they think that's best
It's certainly a very active forum so it couldn't do any harm in informing the Trusts views I wouldn't think (although I imagine the Trust has more members than post actively on here so there's no suggestion we could steer them either)

Just my view

 

What ya shouting for?

 

I did not mention casual racism as I don't believe it was; it was a poorly thought through remark and generalisation, nothing more. You made a big thing of it and used it to further your anti-Trust nonsense. I do agree that PLT would have been wise to apologise should anyone be offended by a remark that he had made with no racist intent - he may of done, I lost interest.

As for you denying what you wrote and what you meant, what utter bollocks. It was plainly written and no one, not just me, misconstrued it. I think it was quite some time before you made a post making your position on concessions clear, which I and others accepted as we kind of realise you are not that kind of guy, you simply posted in haste to be controversial and seem to be suuportive of the Allams - it's what you do.

I really couldn't care less about trying to discredit you on a forum, Happy; why should I, you do a remarkably good job all on your own.

 

I think it's been more than adequately posted on here that OLM does not represent the Trust on here, regardless of what hat he is wearing

We shouldn't lose sight of the fact that just as with SCB, Chazz, Happy Tiger, Dennis, Askew, Castro and my good self (apologies to those not mentioned - you know who you are), he is just one of the ****s who post on here.

 

I can't begin to describe the deep sense of hurt I feel at not being included on your list of first division ****s and being relegated to the second division of those who merely know who they are.

 

You're right, a huge oversight, now put right! A bold retro correction.

 

Looks like I'm top of the league. It's all down to hard work you lower league ****.

 

You can't just promote him because he thinks he deserves to be in the top tier. He gets more Leeds like everyday.