S.A.F.C. - the future

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I might be naive but I don’t think anyone would roll up to this forum specifically to spout lies and wind posters up. Niall Quinn’s Dad is coming out with things that people don’t want to hear but I believe he believes what he is saying.
He seems to me to be getting info from someone/ somewhere and he is passing it on believing it to be true.
Let’s hope his info is wrong but I don’t think he is posting to wind up people.
<laugh>
 
Yeah I don't mind if he goes 3 at the back, it's the rest of the team that's important. Personally I'd go with 4 but maybe not in the first game.
3 at the back can be a very attacking formation, it depends on our central midfield players getting forward when we are in possession and dropping in when we are out of possession.
We also need to move the ball quicker, we are very pedestrian with the ball and allow the opposition to get men behind the ball
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nacho
This is definitely not a takeover though, absolutely not. No evidence whatsoever.
To be honest the club has been turned on its head for the better
Its obvious these are new fresh ideas
we are seeing investment in the club a progressive new structure
A new attack minded head coach
And more to come by all accounts.
Change is here and not being driven by the old Owner (or he would have done it two years ago) He's out

Thats why people are moaning about Lee Johnson.
There's something bigger happening here, they know it but it doesn't fit their agenda
If some pedantic gits want to argue if its a takeover or not I couldn't care less let them get on with it