S.A.F.C. - the future

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Royaldragon said:
In a way I'm not, if we are to change our style of play there might have to be a fair amount of jiggling players about club wise, some of the players who are more popular with the supporters might still get the bullet to get the balance of the squad right for our new style of play.
Click to expand...

I agree with that entirely - but for me Embleton was a different kind of play to what we have. It's not like he's been playing. Like I say though I trust the new guys are making this decision for footballing rather than financial reasons. I just dread seeing another Connor Hourihan, John Egan, Ethan Robson etc (I know Ethan hasn't made it yet - but Blackpool fans love him)
 
  • Like
Reactions: clockstander and Royaldragon
When can we don the French flags (or whatever nationality he is) in our Twitter names?
 
Southern Adam said:
I agree with that entirely - but for me Embleton was a different kind of play to what we have. It's not like he's been playing. Like I say though I trust the new guys are making this decision for footballing rather than financial reasons. I just dread seeing another Connor Hourihan, John Egan, Ethan Robson etc (I know Ethan hasn't made it yet - but Blackpool fans love him)
Click to expand...
We were right to get rid of the first two just pain in the ass that they have overtaken us but weren't good enough at the time
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guy Incognito
Southern Adam said:
I agree with that entirely - but for me Embleton was a different kind of play to what we have. It's not like he's been playing. Like I say though I trust the new guys are making this decision for footballing rather than financial reasons. I just dread seeing another Connor Hourihan, John Egan, Ethan Robson etc (I know Ethan hasn't made it yet - but Blackpool fans love him)
Click to expand...
While I agree it is disappointing if he's on his way, there may be factors at play that we don't know about. And if the poster is saying Barrow on a permanent or Salford on loan, it doesn't seem an ambitious move for himblet alone a profitable one for us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gil T Azell and Smug in Boots
You must log in or register to see images


ATTENTION | Jorge Fosatti agreed to his contract extension with River Plate. He will continue in the Darren team until the end of the Uruguayan Championship, although the club is analyzing a more ambitious project for the future.

More ambitious project? KLD?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Millfield Maestro 1879, Southern A and smithy in nl
Smug in Boots said:
I'm responding to a post entirely about me, on a forum where I can't respond, to someone I know personally ...

... no idea how that makes me bitter or anything like Madbob tbh.

If you can explain, I'm all ears.

As for @wearside wanderer II who posted,

"Why would Ghandi need to go to 606, he’s the rep for here...
He’s represents the smb not 606."

My answer is 'If he's the RTG rep why is he on here looking at posts and commenting about them over there?'

I didn't start this 'conversation' but think I have the right to correct people if they post misinformation.

If people choose to see that as obsessional, bitter or Madbob-esque I couldn't really care any less.
Click to expand...

it’s quite simple mate, he can look and do whatever he wants, if he’s say (for example) the Facebook rep would you want him to go on Twitter??
He’s the smb rep, like I said and I’m sure your not being arsey over it but if this place would like a voice they have to ask the Rawa commitee. as to how it works from there isn’t for me to say but the he says she says between the boards is a bit daft.
You don’t have to be one or the other...
But at the end of the day, Ghandi is the rep for the smb not 606.
 
wearside wanderer II said:
it’s quite simple mate, he can look and do whatever he wants, if he’s say (for example) the Facebook rep would you want him to go on Twitter??
He’s the smb rep, like I said and I’m sure your not being arsey over it but if this place would like a voice they have to ask the Rawa commitee. as to how it works from there isn’t for me to say but the he says she says between the boards is a bit daft.
You don’t have to be one or the other...
But at the end of the day, Ghandi is the rep for the smb not 606.
Click to expand...

So can I ....
 
wearside wanderer II said:
and nobody has said otherwise...
Click to expand...

I don't want to drag this out but Ghandi isn't my rep and doesn't speak for me.

If he wants to comment about me specifically, over there, I feel I have the right to respond.

He's not posting on behalf of RAWA, in that instance, it's just as just another poster ...

... unless, of course, RAWA have a policy on me.

I really don't know why that's a problem for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guy Incognito, Royaldragon and alan reed
Guy Incognito said:
While I agree it is disappointing if he's on his way, there may be factors at play that we don't know about. And if the poster is saying Barrow on a permanent or Salford on loan, it doesn't seem an ambitious move for himblet alone a profitable one for us.
Click to expand...
this is my thinking as well, I reckon that there's some kind of injury or fitness issue going on, maybe he just isn't up to the standards we have set. That's not a criticism, it could be some physiological issue that we can't justify investing time in. We need a squad thats as fit and match-ready as possible, and if that means thinning out the long-term injured players, good. I'm sure that Grigg will be excluded from our squad now to free up a place (if thats doable?) and maybe one or two others (please let it be DG). If Speakman is cracking the whip ready for some January signings, its a positive sign, fingers crossed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger, Guy Incognito, Royaldragon and 1 other person
Smug in Boots said:
I don't want to drag this out but Ghandi isn't my rep and doesn't speak for me.

If he wants to comment about me specifically, over there, I feel I have the right to respond.

He's not posting on behalf of RAWA, in that instance, it's just as just another poster ...

... unless, of course, RAWA have a policy on me.

I really don't know why that's a problem for you.
Click to expand...

it’s not a problem and I’m not sure you actually think I have a problem with it, I think you are just venting.
I’ll say again, he’s the smb rep and not the rep for here, that’s the black and white facts, everything else it’s farts and skids.
As we have discussed previously you are always well within your rights to argue your case, I’ve never had an issue with that as that I’m sure you well know.
Quite why he needs to be invited on here is up for discussion, the lad as a poster can say what he wishes wherever he wishes, you had his number so it all seems a bit high horse imo.
 
wearside wanderer II said:
it’s not a problem and I’m not sure you actually think I have a problem with it, I think you are just venting.
I’ll say again, he’s the smb rep and not the rep for here, that’s the black and white facts, everything else it’s farts and skids.
As we have discussed previously you are always well within your rights to argue your case, I’ve never had an issue with that as that I’m sure you well know.
Quite why he needs to be invited on here is up for discussion, the lad as a poster can say what he wishes wherever he wishes, you had his number so it all seems a bit high horse imo.
Click to expand...
No black and white references are allowed on the Sunderland not606 forum, only red and white ones.:emoticon-0132-envy:
 
  • Like
Reactions: DH4, Skanter, Guy Incognito and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back