Rule R7

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Think you are a bit out on your figures there.

My old man is fine with paying whatever, he can afford it, that i do know.

He offered to pay for mine also if things are still tight, this i wouldn't entertain.
 
If i am right, next season my old man would be paying £324 for (£27x12 months)

I seriously doubt with your £200 increase taken off that price, he is currently paying £124 a season.

I will ask what he has paid this season, i am not 100% sure at this time.
 
If i am right, next season my old man would be paying £324 for (£27x12 months)

I seriously doubt with your £200 increase taken off that price, he is currently paying £124 a season.

I will ask what he has paid this season, i am not 100% sure at this time.

In the South a senior pass was £286 this season, you said in E6 you'd still be better off by £45, I just pointed out that he's be £200 worse off as he'd be paying £486.

You should stop digging.
 
I'm not digging fella, the E6 was mentioned as a far flung supposition.

We will be in the South Stand for this coming season and i don't see why we would be expected to move out as we fall into the "family" group, this we have been told by the club so for me it is point raised and topic closed on the issue.
 
The concession issue doesn't effect me whatsoever other than my old man may get a reduction if the PL enforce concessionary pricing.
All this bickering started when i said i was one who the new membership scheme benefited, as it allows me to watch cheaper (now PL) football than i have been able to over recent years. That is all i said and i was flamed and called from a pig to a dog for doing so.

Morning ****, You didn't actually just say that did you?

"Why should i pay more for my ticket, why should i pay more for "anything" so my neighbour with a tribe can go watch for a fraction of the price i have to pay? People with kids want to take them to see football, pay the going rate for them... My dad did for me until i could afford to pay my way."

Makes you look a little selfish **** who tells porkie pies, a little PLW.

Why didn't you go this season but you're back for the PL? You can stop the pretence that you had a ticket that a mate was using because that's bollocks.
 
Morning ****, You didn't actually just say that did you?

"Why should i pay more for my ticket, why should i pay more for "anything" so my neighbour with a tribe can go watch for a fraction of the price i have to pay? People with kids want to take them to see football, pay the going rate for them... My dad did for me until i could afford to pay my way."

Makes you look a little selfish **** who tells porkie pies, a little PLW.

Why didn't you go this season but you're back for the PL? You can stop the pretence that you had a ticket that a mate was using because that's bollocks.

Read back numbnut, you really are as thick as pigshit aren't you.I had work that i couldn't afford to turn down. My old mans friend took over the seat to keep it for when and if i could go back , now i can afford to go back due to the generous price reduction for me, i will.

I have probably been watching City longer than you have slimed around the earth.

Not that i should have to explain myself over again to a thick scumbag like you! <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: FILEYseadog
Are we not a family group? I think we are. To me Rule 6 says the Family Stand should be available to Family Groups AND junior supporters. Not Family groups WITH junior supporters.

We are currently a family group of 2, is this not within the ruling?

So are two cousins in their 30s but I don't think that is what the ruling means. the intention is for adults with children needing supervision and juniors that don't. require supervision. if you move you could take it up with the club.
 
We won't be moved, don't lose any sleep over it, we aren't.

We have been told we are a family group. 2 cousins would probably fall into the same category also.
 
Read back numbnut, you really are as thick as pigshit aren't you.I had work that i couldn't afford to turn down. My old mans friend took over the seat to keep it for when and if i could go back , now i can afford to go back due to the generous price reduction for me, i will.

I have probably been watching City longer than you have slimed around the earth.

Not that i should have to explain myself over again to a thick scumbag like you! <laugh>

You're getting a little touchy ****, are you being found out?

I bet you was the Torquay game wasn't you?

So this was lie lie then?

"I did not renew my pass this season after 30+ years due to the pricing and work committments, but the way i see it now and understand, i will be able to have a seat (maybe not my seat i gave up) in the south stand for approx £27 a month."

Oh dear.
 
the PL will only allow clubs that have concessions, or at least Im hoping that is the case.
 
What's unclear?

Rule R7 seems very clear and unequivocal; it uses the word concession deliberately, it uses the word must deliberately, also.

If they wished for ticket price structures to be open to all manner of pricing strategies then the rule R7 would not be there to protect concessions - which can be its only purpose.

Maybe your perspective needs the professionalism of understanding the rule R7 and how that conflicts with the new membership scheme.

If you were a lawyer you'd be describing R7 as so ambiguous it's almost pointless.
My perspective is to look at how words have legal meaning, wi the benefit of legal training and qualifications.
Imagine a law saying you must have chocolate for old people: then think what counts as chocolate, and how old qualifies.
R7 is about as equivocal as a politicians answer... It can be read in a hundred different ways.
To think I don't understand what it says is stupid, to think what it says can be quantified is the issue!
If it can't be defined completely it can't be enforced. That's why legislation has elaboration. If R7 has elaboration somewhere, or persuasive notes to expand on it, great. If not, it's not simple to apply it.

Think about what concessions means, or may mean. Then think what available means, as the club are making an "option" available to any OAP (they can choose to accept something else).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tiger Barmy
If you were a lawyer you'd be describing R7 as so ambiguous it's almost pointless.
My perspective is to look at how words have legal meaning, wi the benefit of legal training and qualifications.
Imagine a law saying you must have chocolate for old people: then think what counts as chocolate, and how old qualifies.
R7 is about as equivocal as a politicians answer... It can be read in a hundred different ways.
To think I don't understand what it says is stupid, to think what it says can be quantified is the issue!
If it can't be defined completely it can't be enforced. That's why legislation has elaboration. If R7 has elaboration somewhere, or persuasive notes to expand on it, great. If not, it's not simple to apply it.

The rules say we MUST offer concessions to kids and seniors, we are currently promoting that fact that we offer no concessions to these groups, that clearly puts us in breach of those rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fez