Maybe £45 to you isn't a lot of money, it maybe to myself and others.
£45 a year is a great saving for me.
£45 a year is a great saving for me.
Maybe £45 to you isn't a lot of money, it maybe to myself and others.
£45 a year is a great saving for me.
If i am right, next season my old man would be paying £324 for (£27x12 months)
I seriously doubt with your £200 increase taken off that price, he is currently paying £124 a season.
I will ask what he has paid this season, i am not 100% sure at this time.
The concession issue doesn't effect me whatsoever other than my old man may get a reduction if the PL enforce concessionary pricing.
All this bickering started when i said i was one who the new membership scheme benefited, as it allows me to watch cheaper (now PL) football than i have been able to over recent years. That is all i said and i was flamed and called from a pig to a dog for doing so.
Morning ****, You didn't actually just say that did you?
"Why should i pay more for my ticket, why should i pay more for "anything" so my neighbour with a tribe can go watch for a fraction of the price i have to pay? People with kids want to take them to see football, pay the going rate for them... My dad did for me until i could afford to pay my way."
Makes you look a little selfish **** who tells porkie pies, a little PLW.
Why didn't you go this season but you're back for the PL? You can stop the pretence that you had a ticket that a mate was using because that's bollocks.

Are we not a family group? I think we are. To me Rule 6 says the Family Stand should be available to Family Groups AND junior supporters. Not Family groups WITH junior supporters.
We are currently a family group of 2, is this not within the ruling?
Read back numbnut, you really are as thick as pigshit aren't you.I had work that i couldn't afford to turn down. My old mans friend took over the seat to keep it for when and if i could go back , now i can afford to go back due to the generous price reduction for me, i will.
I have probably been watching City longer than you have slimed around the earth.
Not that i should have to explain myself over again to a thick scumbag like you!![]()
We won't be moved, don't lose any sleep over it, we aren't.
We have been told we are a family group. 2 cousins would probably fall into the same category also.
They've relaxed the rules for this first season, the original rule was that it had to be an adult (or adults) with an U18.
looking forward to your 1st season?Thank you again for the clarification. Maybe it will sink in sooner or later.
What's unclear?
Rule R7 seems very clear and unequivocal; it uses the word concession deliberately, it uses the word must deliberately, also.
If they wished for ticket price structures to be open to all manner of pricing strategies then the rule R7 would not be there to protect concessions - which can be its only purpose.
Maybe your perspective needs the professionalism of understanding the rule R7 and how that conflicts with the new membership scheme.
If you were a lawyer you'd be describing R7 as so ambiguous it's almost pointless.
My perspective is to look at how words have legal meaning, wi the benefit of legal training and qualifications.
Imagine a law saying you must have chocolate for old people: then think what counts as chocolate, and how old qualifies.
R7 is about as equivocal as a politicians answer... It can be read in a hundred different ways.
To think I don't understand what it says is stupid, to think what it says can be quantified is the issue!
If it can't be defined completely it can't be enforced. That's why legislation has elaboration. If R7 has elaboration somewhere, or persuasive notes to expand on it, great. If not, it's not simple to apply it.