Rosenior's been released
- Thread starter originallambrettaman
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I like Circular Arguments more, it gives a nod to the stadium ownership being the root cause of them all.
Can we take it that you don't believe this story then, I'm not really clear what point you're trying to make?
Absolutely. Maybe the complaints about the negativity of HDM and RH are really what the people of Hull want.
A good thread?It's a load of idle gossip and speculation. Heaven forbid someone has an alternative view.
Your contribution was just your usual snide ****e, not even on topic you tedious arse hole.
Good stuff this ^^^^ you really show your lack of quality. You've made yourself look the **** you are and it grates now, doesn't it. It a forum discussion and I've discussed squad and positions - what have you done except attack for what reason? You'll move on next to complain about name calling, then you'll be editing posts and then moving them. Big lad aren't you, cock of the board in more ways than one.
Do you ever discuss football? Anyway, I'll withdraw as it was never my intention to aid you in derailing the thread.
Or even 'propaganda'. There's so much choice really, it could take up more time than the book itself.
It'd need one hell of a proof reader that's for sure.
11 pages of outrage and indignation based on rumour and speculation, plus made up crap.
I'd like to say it's a surprise.
I'd like to say it's a surprise.
Don't you just love those moments when you decide to flick to the last couple of pages of a thread and find nothing but bickering.
On which page did everyone reach a consensus that Rosenior is ace and should have been signed up?
On which page did everyone reach a consensus that Rosenior is ace and should have been signed up?
We?
The point was simply people running off with negatives on what is pure speculation.
So far, we're told Rosey hasn't got a contract. The rest is pure guesswork, but nearly always negative.
It's been clear all the time that some will go now the seasons ended. It doexn't need to be a witch hunt.
There should be a counter that keeps the post qty of the thread before it goes into meltdown and calling people ****s.
Good stuff this ^^^^ you really show your lack of quality. You've made yourself look the **** you are and it grates now, doesn't it. It a forum discussion and I've discussed squad and positions - what have you done except attack for what reason? You'll move on next to complain about name calling, then you'll be editing posts and then moving them. Big lad aren't you, cock of the board in more ways than one.
Do you ever discuss football? Anyway, I'll withdraw as it was never my intention to aid you in derailing the thread.
Oh dear, Fez decides to go all ad hominem and claim others are disrupting threads. How tedious.
I'm finding it hard to see the positive in this story.
Liam is a very popular player, a player who's never let us down, has always performed when called upon and has never complained about playing second fiddle.
I think it's understandable that most fans are upset about him being released, they're finding it hard to understand the reasoning.
Considering how popular he is, it might have been a good idea to tie in his release with some sort if statement on why the decision was made. Bruce is an honest bloke, he doesn't normally have an issue with explaining himself, I think Liam has earned that much.
I like discussing rumours. I think we all do.
Do we have to wait for absolute clarification on everything? It's not often the club chooses to keep the fans updated on anything anyway, is it?
Also, it's a shame that people's praise and gratitude to Rosie is now about six pages deep.
It's almost like some people will take any opportunity at all, no matter what, to disagree very loudly with a single poster.
Sad.
Do we have to wait for absolute clarification on everything? It's not often the club chooses to keep the fans updated on anything anyway, is it?
Also, it's a shame that people's praise and gratitude to Rosie is now about six pages deep.
It's almost like some people will take any opportunity at all, no matter what, to disagree very loudly with a single poster.
Sad.
Sorry, missed this one. I have added to the pro and cons in the same way everyone else has; give me a link where I am looking for an argument. What's boring is you trying to be prescriptive about what folk can and cannot discuss; go and start a thread about the merits about being positive, as this one is about Rosenior not being offered a new contract - do you not believe that is the case? (You see how I am trying to get it and you on topic?)
A new club badge could have crossed pitchforks and a flaming torch incorporated into it.
Surely discussing the negative nature (or otherwise) is part of that discussion?
I'd say that's more constructive than just 'liking' certain posts.
I think a simple 'like' for a comment you agree with is better board etiquette than honing in persistently on one person's posts to pick fault anywhere and everywhere, and not give a thought for how threads then turn out.
You disagree with OLM a lot, we get it.
I read on here that Rosy was upset by the Livermore situation, if he him and Hudds are some sort of clique that has brought us down then maybe there is some sense to it but I am sad they let Rosy go. I think we need more details on this before passing judgement.