Don't I know what it was? Okay then, but at least you now know the Police claim that it was a flare, and the associated bollocks they spouted because of that lie is total hogwash. Leaves the rest of their "argument" flapping in the wind
I think we can agree it was a smoke device of some sorts
1) that could cause respiratory issues ! and i never made a claim to know what the police have said !
More deaths each year are as a result of vehicle fumes than as a result of vehicle accidents. If people coughed up those car fumes, the results wouldn't be so bad, but they inhale them deep into the system because the particles are small
Agree, but i dont see a car next to me with the engine turned on while i am at a match ! and my main point was a flare a risk to respiratory issues which could be brought into a stadium and feel you side tracked a bit of the main point !
By contrast, smoke particles in the bombs are bigger, they have to be to be seen. As a consequence, you're unlikely to be able to inhale them past the nose and throat hairs, so there is very minimal, if any, risk to health
Agreed there is a long term risk of smoke fumes from cars and you said from the above. Back to my main point is there a risk from flares and with all the tarting and going round the long way and adding videos proving there is a coughing choking and gasping for breath and fear elements to a flare i wouldn't want my two year old son or myself near one
And what right has the person letting of the flare to put my family at risk , Did that person go round and ask permission before lighting the flare ?
And as i fear you suffer from Last Word Syndrome i will leave the last word for you
Last Word Syndrome:
The Last Word Syndrome is characterized by, obviously, having to have the last word in any discussions or argument. Its secondary symptoms include a pathological need to justify this compulsion via proving the other party’s opinion is unworthy by uncovering any and all faults in others, incessantly harping on these as a means of validation. This is as opposed to, say, using facts and logic as a means of supporting ones assertions