Political purposes ? I don't understand that one
It's not difficult, views and issues are given a slant from the reality to support a belief or biased viewpoint
Flares can be dangerous but then again they are seen at football grounds throughout Europe
So makes them okay then, despite the injuries and fatalities?
You are essentially saying anybody who doesn't agree with your opinion isn't very intelligent
No it does not. It says that in the wrong hands and circumstances these flares and bombs are dangerous - that is proven by the injuries and fatalities.
Edit . A smoke bomb isn't a flare , the HDM talking about the Bradford fire was ridiculous as well