Reasons for changing the name

I doubt it. The potential income isn't about kit sales to current fans, it's supposedly about expanding the whole commercial side to a new market.

However, none of that is a justification in favour of the name change. As yet, I've still to see one.

 

There are 3 viewpoints here.

1. Will not support the name change
2. Will support the name change
3. Will not oppose the name change.

When you understand the difference between viewpoints 2 and viewpoints 3, you will have your answer.

 

The "new market" is pie in the sky at the moment. The club will depend on local sales for the foreseeable future.

I gave you my justification for a name change and my reasons for believing AA will eventually compromise.

 

Not really, there's several options posted on this thread alone that are wider than that, however, the question here is "why should the name change?"

 

Why is it on those with the positive view to make their case?

Surely the owners are the ones who have made the decision and it is their club to do as they wish with – within normal business and FA/PL contractual constraints; so if anyone has to prove why they hold a view, it must surely be those in opposition to the decision of the owners and decision makers.

What is this bunkum about pushing the onus for justification onto those who don’t embrace the campaign?

 

Are you saying that the name change will sell more shirts than the existing name does?

 

but by that time it will be too late cos Hull Tigers will have assimilated into the public's and locals consciousness as a winning, European team - look at how Leeds live in their past glories.
Are you honestly saying that we will be any different? look at the way some on here revere PB...... claiming that he was our best manager. LIVING IN THE PAST is what football fans do.

 

And who are you are aiming that question at?

Viewpoint 2 will say to attract investment, viewpoint 3 don't care.

 

Because all that ^^^ is on the other threads along with plenty of justification on why people are against the change.

THIS thread is for those who have been against the campaign to clarify their position.

 

So, HOW will it attract investment over the current name?

 

So are you saying success will only come with a name change?

If so, how?

If not, what benefit would the name change bring?

 

perhaps the question should be, why not? (other than emotive reasons that is)

 

Nope. The question on this thread is why? What benefit will it bring?

 

Hull Tigers kits won't sell because feeling is too high against them. What the protesters need to do is cement that opposition in a document that can't be ignored (for business reasons) by the club.

However there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that the opposition isn't as strong as you would like it to be (and could be weakening more as the new name becomes more familiar). So you have to organise the support you have quickly and try to speak with one voice.

 

no, I am not saying that a name change will bring success.
that is a bit simplistic.
I am saying that success could come with a name change, in the knowledge that we wont notice.
they KNOW that we wont notice, in the same way that if this was originally announced DURING the football season we wouldn't have noticed that much.

 

All fair comment, but I'm interested in what benefits people say the name change will bring. I'd expected it to be a simple question.

 

So you have no justifiable reason for believing the name change will benefit Hull City?

 

I think that we ALL can agree, the only way that we will attract success, is to be successful on the pitch.

an asian businessman is not gonna go "ooh tiger - invest!"
they only want to invest in a major team in PL that has had success.

 

From where I sit the opposition seems to be getting stronger.

I see you haven't answered my question. I'll rephrase it, if we become Hull Tigers or Hull City Tigers what do you think our new nickname should be?

 

I am not a successful businessman, IF I could answer that question - Id be rich.
Now let me ask you a question, apart from emotive reasons, what justifiable reason do you have for believing that the name change will be detrimental to Hull City?