Conveniently left off the bit where I prove you just signed another sack of **** for your so called football team.
Their owners never had the money. Fernandes wealth increased by £200m this year, thats the stadium paid for on its own. Then theres Mittal who at last count was worth £26 billion. Building a new stadium to him is like building a £300 shed for us. Our owners have the disposable income and arent looking for any other money to do it. We are also debt free so are in a fantastic position.
To be fair Swords, Flyer has made some valid and intelligent points! You, on the other hand, have made homophobic references to the photo of one of our team's loyal servants! I've looked on the QPR board and several of your posters have a photo of a QPR player (past or present) as their avatar! I assume that you think they are all gay as well? More likely, you can't think of anything to counter Beefy's comments, so you resort to playground antics, and I'll tell you what, it's worked, you come across as a very low intelligence schoolboy!
Easily??? They both eneded 2-1. First match at Carrow Road was tight one and you finally beat us due our defence error. Second match at LR was also very tight and you can thank B Johnsons theatrical skills in a leading role for it. Anyway that is ancient history now and we are concentrating for much more bigger things now. Like a better team and better stadium. You also wrote that Park was a Manu reject. Maybe so in some level, but just check some manure posters opinions from their board. Most of them wrote, that was sad to see him go. I believe you would be over the moon if Park would have signed to Norwich. Well, he didnt and now you just have to wish that Norwich would pull another miracle season. Otherwise its championship footie for you.
Yeah, easily. And if we signed Park I'd be thinking "The other players are going to be pissed off at his wages" to be fair But you seem okay with paying all your useless players millions, so maybe it's okay.
If you signed Park you'd have ejaculated in your pants and spent the rest of the day gleefully typing about how Norwich gazumped QPR.
Beef; I think Park is a decent bit of business at £2 million, say what you like about him but I value not only Mark Hughes opinion but also SAF in higher regard than any off the cuff comment you can come up with. As for Norwich signing Butterfield....... a 22 year old who had only just broken into a lower level championship team last season and who has not played since being injured in december 2011........ will he even get a start this year?? So lets compare Park with Butterfield........ I know where i'm laying my bet. I agree with your team's values of building for the future with youth and a sensible wage structure but do you honestly believe that you can continue to survive in the PL consistently following that rule?
hoopy, though your point is valid it is also naive in the extreme. you've made the same mistake that many football fans make - judged a player on their name rather than what they are capable of. jacob butterfield is an england u21 international who has been likened to paul gascoigne by his fellow pros. two footed, shoots from anywhere, runs a game, creative, scores goals, captain at 21 years of age... we've bought a player who could well be worth £20m in two years time if we keep him moving in the right direction. you've bought a hard-working player, a player i like, but he is not a top player - he is ageing, he has never been a regular at his club and although he will be an improvement on what you already had, he is not an exciting player but will give you energy. who got the better deal? absolutely no question - its norwich
Superman; I think you've confused my comment, I do not mean to belittle the Butterfield signing, I applaud bringing in young Englishman that could one day represent their country, and correct me if i'm mistaken but I thought he got injured before playing for the U21? I have not fallen for the trap of just signing a name, I may have done that as a child when signing Mark Hateley I am simply getting at the fact that I would rather take Park over Butterfield in the upcoming season, and let's be honest, just because someone is not a first team regular at Man Utd doesn't mean that at least 14 other PL clubs wouldn't be fighting for their signature. You raise another point about the better deal, well it's something that we can both both claim for many different reasons but as with all things in life, only time will tell
Please, do that mate. I also like to wish all the luck for you for post-lambert time. We all know you going to need it.
fair comments hoopy as i say, i like park - i think £2m is a good price. is he the kind of signing who will definitely make you safe from relegation? not so sure. its the kind of signing which looks like its ambitious but in reality its not, if you see what i mean! had park not gone to qpr, who would have been in for him do we think? west ham maybe? stoke? certainly not one of the big boys.
igor, obviously its an interesting time now lambert has departed but we still have the same players which we are improving on. as replacements go, hughton was just about the best we could hope to get to come in - he assures a steady and smooth transition. i'd be far more worried if we'd appointed steve clarke, like west brom have, or even laudrup at swansea who is a slightly unknown factor in the premier league. great players (and boy was he great) do not always make great managers and his track record is good but not great. interesting times!
I think the signing has two angles tbh, one being the marketing potential of QPR in the Far East, I don't think it's a coincidence Park was announced just before our tour of the Far East. I also think Park is a hard working player, and although I agree he won't be tearing up trees this year I think he is as a you say a had working player who will always do what is asked of him. That's all I expect when I watch players at my club, 100% commitment. I think Park fits that bill perfectly.
You keep comparing us to Portsmouth, but you might be better looking at City and Chelsea for your comparisons, similar wealth involved. 'Enjoy yourself' while you're "waiting"
hahahahahaahahaha Both City and Chelsea have had large stadiums for years and big fan bases. Top flight clubs (though City had a blip in the late 1990s) for decades, winning league titles. Yes, they both got back to the top through an injection of money, but they are a completely different kettle o' Fish AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I love this quote
