S
Sour Patch
Guest
You've said a lot here but pretty much none of it is relevant.Sacking Mowbray without any evidence they had a succession plan in mind.
Which is why we ended up with Beale, who was clearly the cheapest option and only seems to have opened his mouth to change feet, spending the first month playing exactly the same way that got his predecessor sacked.
Doing their best to burn out Bellingham. If it's because he has to play, then it's even worse.
And now we have the Pritchard situation.
It just feels like a series of poor decisions and situations created by them all of a sudden, so what's changed.
That's before we get to the off field stuff.
Mowbray was deservedly sacked.
Say what you want about succession planning but if they feel like they got the right man then it doesn't really matter that it took 2 weeks.
Paying Mowbray off and employing a coach who would've been sitting on a pile of money he got from Rangers was not the cheap option, Dodds would've been the cheap option.
Jobe didn't look burnt out yesterday, he was just played in the correct position eventually. And was very good.
What is the Pritchard situation? Give me some facts please. Not rumours.
The off field stuff has no relevance, Speakman has no influence on off field operations so what on earth are you talking about?