Off Topic Prince Andrew
- Thread starter Libby
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Never needed them to be pissed ... go sleep it off and we'll speak in the morning
ffs, from the man who posts pissed in bed, waiting for a poll to end.
Not sure I've ever posted pissed, maybe once ... you, on the other hand, seem to be the antithesis ... each to their own.
Ok Ron, the truth is out there.Not sure I've ever posted pissed, maybe once ... you, on the other hand, seem to be the antithesis ... each to their own.
And you're little pissed night whilst waiting for for poxy hiag poll to finish at midnight, drinking wine in bed pissed never happened.
First signs mate, get it checked out.
You live in a very strange world fella ... very detached from reality ... perhaps that's what makes you such a continually angry little cherub?Ok Ron, the truth is out there.
And you're little pissed night whilst waiting for for poxy hiag poll to finish at midnight, drinking wine in bed pissed never happened.
First signs mate, get it checked out.
Wish I had the misfortune of finding myself amongst an Orgy at 17
She mother and Fatherless when she was 17? Haven't read the back drop...who is to blame for her double penetration sessions? Not being funny but wish I was lured into a few orgies at that age...looking back I would have known it's coz I was a bit of a wrong un aswell...so I'd just wind my neck in and crack on with life.
It's all about the bling money n ting that givin up your pussy can bring
She mother and Fatherless when she was 17? Haven't read the back drop...who is to blame for her double penetration sessions? Not being funny but wish I was lured into a few orgies at that age...looking back I would have known it's coz I was a bit of a wrong un aswell...so I'd just wind my neck in and crack on with life.
It's all about the bling money n ting that givin up your pussy can bring
She states that the other female participants looked younger than 17 and didn’t speak English. Epstein was trafficking young girls and abusing them.
In that pic she looks on it though
She knows she’s a young blonde hottie and she’s played the game...got stung but that’s the chance you take no?
Not removing any blame from Andy for his part but she’s definitely played the game and now she’s up in arms...it kind of dissipates my sympathy.
I agree with you. No excuses for him absolutely and Epstein was an utter scrote ... but she loses credibility when she says "I was forced to have sex with the Prince ... on 3 separate occasions"
once is terrible and understandably scarring ... so why on earth would she let herself be put in that position on two more occasions? ... quite bizarre ... perhaps there is a plausible explanation? ... but I haven't seen one as yet 
She was abused and exploited by people much older than her. I don't know the details of her personal situation at the time but would bet that she was vulnerable and that's why she was targeted. Either that or she was naive, immature or desperate for attention.
As you said, where were the parents?
Whatever, you don't do that to a 17 year old girl just because you're rich and powerful.
Money?I agree with you. No excuses for him absolutely and Epstein was an utter scrote ... but she loses credibility when she says "I was forced to have sex with the Prince ... on 3 separate occasions"
.I agree with you. No excuses for him absolutely and Epstein was an utter scrote ... but she loses credibility when she says "I was forced to have sex with the Prince ... on 3 separate occasions"
Last edited:
...she loses credibility when she says "I was forced to have sex with the Prince ... on 3 separate occasions"
You clearly lack any understanding as to how abuse works on its victims.
It is people like you that enable predators like Epstein and Andrew Windsor to get away with this kind of abuse.
Last edited:
Your accusation that it is 'people like me' that 'enable predators like Epstein' is both disgusting and reprehensible...not to mention ignorant. You don't know me.
That you do it from the anonymity of a sock account is not surprising and reflects the true character behind the sock ... and I am not convinced that it's HIAG btw... but it is someone with a personal grudge, no doubt.
In contrast, it is people like me who do not convict people merely on press speculation but wait for firm evidence of a crime committed. In doing so we ask questions about things that need such questions asking to establish full facts / the truth.
All that I have done on this thread is pointed out that a photo of Andrew with the girl proves only that they were at the same event. It does not prove intimacy.
I also wondered why the girl carried on going to more events if the first encounter happened as she says - when surely human nature is to avoid a repeat of bad experiences? That seems a legitimate question to me?
Others have been less generous about the girls 'motives' for making these accusations, yet you have remained silent, instead singling me out for your abhorrent accusations - I wonder why? ... and where has the pidgin English suddenly gone?
That the Super mod has endorsed your post is a damning indictment of his suitability for such a role and further proof, if it were needed, of his double standards in regards to personal attacks on this forum.
Finally, 'people like me' are so concerned about the possibility of predators that we give up having a drink for every party that teenage daughters have ever attended in order to be there to drive them and their friends home, usually in the early hours of the morning. No marttyr. Merely whatt I see as being the responsibilties of being a dad.
Your accusation that it is 'people like me' that 'enable predators like Epstein' is both disgusting and reprehensible...not to mention ignorant. You don't know me.
That you do it from the anonymity of a sock account is not surprising and reflects the true character behind the sock ... and I am not convinced that it's HIAG btw... but it is someone with a personal grudge, no doubt.
In contrast, it is people like me who do not convict people merely on press speculation but wait for firm evidence of a crime committed. In doing so we ask questions about things that need such questions asking to establish full facts / the truth.
All that I have done on this thread is pointed out that a photo of Andrew with the girl proves only that they were at the same event. It does not prove intimacy.
I also wondered why the girl carried on going to more events if the first encounter happened as she says - when surely human nature is to avoid a repeat of bad experiences? That seems a legitimate question to me?
Others have been less generous about the girls 'motives' for making these accusations, yet you have remained silent, instead singling me out for your abhorrent accusations - I wonder why? ... and where has the pidgin English suddenly gone?
That the Super mod has endorsed your post is a damning indictment of his suitability for such a role and further proof, if it were needed, of his double standards in regards to personal attacks on this forum.
Finally, 'people like me' are so concerned about the possibility of predators that we give up having a drink for every party that teenage daughters have ever attended in order to be there to drive them and their friends home, usually in the early hours of the morning. No marttyr. Merely whatt I see as being the responsibilties of being a dad.
Nope. I not understand single word.
Your accusation that it is 'people like me' that 'enable predators like Epstein' is both disgusting and reprehensible...not to mention ignorant. You don't know me.
That you do it from the anonymity of a sock account is not surprising and reflects the true character behind the sock ... and I am not convinced that it's HIAG btw... but it is someone with a personal grudge, no doubt.
In contrast, it is people like me who do not convict people merely on press speculation but wait for firm evidence of a crime committed. In doing so we ask questions about things that need such questions asking to establish full facts / the truth.
All that I have done on this thread is pointed out that a photo of Andrew with the girl proves only that they were at the same event. It does not prove intimacy.
I also wondered why the girl carried on going to more events if the first encounter happened as she says - when surely human nature is to avoid a repeat of bad experiences? That seems a legitimate question to me?
Others have been less generous about the girls 'motives' for making these accusations, yet you have remained silent, instead singling me out for your abhorrent accusations - I wonder why? ... and where has the pidgin English suddenly gone?
That the Super mod has endorsed your post is a damning indictment of his suitability for such a role and further proof, if it were needed, of his double standards in regards to personal attacks on this forum.
Finally, 'people like me' are so concerned about the possibility of predators that we give up having a drink for every party that teenage daughters have ever attended in order to be there to drive them and their friends home, usually in the early hours of the morning. No marttyr. Merely whatt I see as being the responsibilties of being a dad.
You must log in or register to see images
- Status