Off Topic Prince Andrew

So it's down to state laws?

She was a whore, and going by the pics was under no duress.. Seeing as she met him 3 times (apparently)

 

Some people are just harder to educate than others, but at least I do try.

Im sure when a guy is kneeling in an orange suit, he smiles nicely for the camera, to demonstrate he is being treated well by his captors. However, his captors also like to play the camera, and a few days later he will be minus his head.

The moral of the story being a camera does lie. But if it makes you happier that for **** Andrew and Co, she was a whore, who am i to argue with your sad misguided judgement.

 

Are you saying she wasn't a whore then?


it'ss that time of night again

 

Tbf this aint the 1st time comm has backed a peedo.

please log in to view this image

 

Not savvy enough to look up the local age of consent though, the big royally nonce.

 

Would you say the same if it was a 15 year old here?

 

Or a girl who looked a bit older but he’d picked up from school.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-50633640

 

As some seem keen on facts, a quick point of information. This will no doubt be followed by the usual whataboutery, abuse and claims I'm defending him, despite raising it several times along with the other frequent flyers on the Lolita Express and UK Government cover ups, back when it didn't suit some peoples political agenda.

From the evidence, Prince Andrew is not a '****'.

****phile - prepubescent.
hebephile - 11-14 years of age.
ephebophile - 15 - 16 years of age.
teleiophile > 17years of age.
gerentophile - Rooneys.

Carry on.

 

No ... but if she was a 16 year old here we wouldn't even be having the debate about her age.

For me, she was used as a plaything of the powerful and that in itself is very wrong and Andrew showed very poor judgement ... but I fail to see that he forced her into anything ... Epstein is very different.

 

There’s an obvious response here but it’s a nailed on ban and no one wants that.

 

More to add to the list

 

Well we probably would, just not from a legal standpoint though I take your point.

He might not have physically forced her, but there seems to be evidence that he knew what was going on there and is therefore complicit imo.

 

Is that about someone being so knowledgeable about the subject matter of age of consent, as if they have studied this... for educational purposes only, honest guv?

 

It doesn’t sound like she had a lot of say in the matter. It’s all rather rapey in my uneducated view but I’m sure there’s a very intelligent technical definition which someone can provide while definitely not defending it or attention-seeking.

 

So what do we think lads, if this had been done by say a bunch of Asian men who lets say are Muslims, people would still be defending the pervy ****s?

 

If you’re proud of your ignorance that’s on you, bro.

 

Exactly this.

 

And this.

 

My problem in all this is that she gets off scotch free...she wasn't walking home from work through the park and got raped...she was in an environment she ****in knew about...she was milking the positives of it be it glamour, potential wealth...let's call it networking

Even a tramp stealing from Primark gets put on some kind of programme

I'm not sympathising with her like I would for that poor woman minding her own getting raped

She was in that circle....it will have been a sexual hubub...plenty innuendo....why didn't she open the front door and go home? Why didn't she just **** off and work in McDonald's for the summer?

Personally I think it's another female milking her youth, prowess and beauty and she got stung

None of this has defended Andy...bit she's not getting off for nothing in the not606 court, im afraid